-
I want to thank all the members that have upgraded your accounts. I truly appreciate your support of the site monetarily. Supporting the site keeps this site up and running as a lot of work daily goes on behind the scenes. Click to Support Signs101 ...
High School Mascots
- Thread starter BrianKE
- Start date
Dennis Schaub
New Member
I found this online:
"I sent an email to the school board - they forwarded it their lawyer - who responded and let me know that public school names are public domain as well as most of the school logos. Certain logos are copyrighted by their artists and the school(s) have free license to use them and I could send any designs to them for review if necessary.
I also had to agree to avoid anything disparaging or of questionable taste involving the school's names and/or logos."
"I sent an email to the school board - they forwarded it their lawyer - who responded and let me know that public school names are public domain as well as most of the school logos. Certain logos are copyrighted by their artists and the school(s) have free license to use them and I could send any designs to them for review if necessary.
I also had to agree to avoid anything disparaging or of questionable taste involving the school's names and/or logos."
mmblarg
New Member
If there is ever question on the legalities, always best just to default to asking for permission. In our area, the school board is super lax and the individual schools are all pretty happy to see proud students displaying their logo, so no permission needed. In most cases, many of the schools come to us for various projects as well once they know we have their logos on file and have seen some of our handiwork.
The Vector Doctor
Chief Bezier Manipulator
And they don't always get away with it. This happened at a school near us
Ohio school to change logo after complaint from University of Arizona
Ohio school to change logo after complaint from University of Arizona
signbrad
New Member
Part of this USA Today Sports story reads, "An employee at a [local] memorabilia store said:
'(Arizona is) 2000 miles away. What do they care for a little farm community and a very small school?' ”
Her argument is that it's okay for a school to infringe a trademark as long as they are small and made up of farmers? Is this a valid argument?
There is a better argument that a school, large or small, should set an example in the practice of ethics. Schools are, after all, in the business of preparing young people to eventually enter the working world, including agri-business, as, presumably, law-abiding citizens.
Most of us teach our kids to respect the property of others. Many teach their kids that it's wrong to steal something even if it's small.
Some people might argue that using the college logo will not really hurt the University of Arizona. I heard a similar argument from a 12-year-old to justify his shoplifting. "It was just one magazine. They won't miss it."
The small school mentioned in the news story did the right thing. They stopped the merchandising of items with the infringing mark and they agreed to change their logo.
A trademark can be a valuable asset for a business. Universities are businesses, too. Many big schools say they are really struggling with funding cuts and with trying to keep tuitions from spiraling out of reach. And a successful college athletic program can generate lots of needed cash, not just in ticket sales, but in merchandising. I have heard that the income that the NFL receives from merchandise sales far exceeds that from ticket sales. So, protecting a trademark is all about the money. It can make the difference for financial survival. But that's what all business is about, right?
Also, there is a reason why many businesses are very aggressive about pursuing even small infringements. It's because it gives them a stronger legal position if and when the time comes they are involved in a serious litigation later. If, on the other hand, they have developed a reputation for being lax, allowing lots of possible infringements to slide without challenging them, they could end up in a weaker position in a court battle later.
Interestingly, there is a small school in my area that has a team logo that is an exact duplicate of an NFL football team logo. They changed nothing to the logo. As the internet continues to make the world flatter and flatter, it will be interesting to see how long it takes before the NFL notices it.
I'm not turning them in. I'm not the trademark police. Besides, they're just little kids, right?
'(Arizona is) 2000 miles away. What do they care for a little farm community and a very small school?' ”
Her argument is that it's okay for a school to infringe a trademark as long as they are small and made up of farmers? Is this a valid argument?
There is a better argument that a school, large or small, should set an example in the practice of ethics. Schools are, after all, in the business of preparing young people to eventually enter the working world, including agri-business, as, presumably, law-abiding citizens.
Most of us teach our kids to respect the property of others. Many teach their kids that it's wrong to steal something even if it's small.
Some people might argue that using the college logo will not really hurt the University of Arizona. I heard a similar argument from a 12-year-old to justify his shoplifting. "It was just one magazine. They won't miss it."
The small school mentioned in the news story did the right thing. They stopped the merchandising of items with the infringing mark and they agreed to change their logo.
A trademark can be a valuable asset for a business. Universities are businesses, too. Many big schools say they are really struggling with funding cuts and with trying to keep tuitions from spiraling out of reach. And a successful college athletic program can generate lots of needed cash, not just in ticket sales, but in merchandising. I have heard that the income that the NFL receives from merchandise sales far exceeds that from ticket sales. So, protecting a trademark is all about the money. It can make the difference for financial survival. But that's what all business is about, right?
Also, there is a reason why many businesses are very aggressive about pursuing even small infringements. It's because it gives them a stronger legal position if and when the time comes they are involved in a serious litigation later. If, on the other hand, they have developed a reputation for being lax, allowing lots of possible infringements to slide without challenging them, they could end up in a weaker position in a court battle later.
Interestingly, there is a small school in my area that has a team logo that is an exact duplicate of an NFL football team logo. They changed nothing to the logo. As the internet continues to make the world flatter and flatter, it will be interesting to see how long it takes before the NFL notices it.
I'm not turning them in. I'm not the trademark police. Besides, they're just little kids, right?