This is a touchy situation. We know what the California Law "says", but how it often done is an entirely different situation. Ask any Sign franchise owner. Then ask the exact same question. But the say, "Now tell me the truth." immediately after the question. Check the look on their face...
Signspe, you are right in your thinking. But I have to ask, if this was a concern, why didn't you set the precedent at the outset of the project? During the quoting/consultation phase? Also, was a permit pulled? If so, (for your sake, I hope so) there is your bargaining chip. Your CL is on the permit. If it becomes a problem, you can contact the city and pull your license. Not sure of the exact nomenclature, but I know for certain it can be done. But going forward, that is a very important detail you need to figure out in the beginning. But again the whole broker scenario is done often.
Get paid. Move on. Be
specific with your client next time.
I am a licensed C45 in CA. I recently did an electrical sign job for a graphic designer who is now demanding that she invoice the client for the design, fabrication and installaton. She's says that she will re-reimburse me for the fabrication and the installation. I told her that California State Law requires me to invoice the client for the work I did. Am I correct?
