I doubt if Scanvec-Amiable would ever drop support of the Mac platform. Flexi has had a Mac version as long as I can remember.
However, it will be interesting to see how Scanvec-Amiable handles the transition from PowerPC-based code to Intel x86-based code in MacOSX. How fast will the transition take and how long with the company maintain service on both PPC and x86 code builds for MacOSX?
My experience with Scanvec-Amiable's customer service has been decidedly hit or miss. Sometimes they'll be very good at solving problems. Other times you'll leave a message with them and never get your call returned.
Previous versions of Flexi have had some hodge podge code. I thought it was ridiculous that the version 6.x release of Flexi had trouble working under WinXP. I think it is time for Scanvec-Amiable to do a complete overhaul of their application code, particularly with the transition to 64-bit operation looming ahead.
With two different Intel-based operating systems now to support (Mac OS and Windows) along with legacy MacOS support under PowerPC, Scanvec-Amiable needs to look at a top to bottom overhaul of code in 64-bit words and done so in a clean fat-binary form that may port more easily to the three different OS builds.
Some industry specific applications re-use chunks of what some people call "public domain code" and all sorts of other libraries. The end result definitely takes on a Frankensteined feel. When the software developer writes the code clean althroughout compatibility is going to be far better. Adobe has been pretty good about that. I can load a 10 year old copy of Photoshop in WinXP SP2 without any problems.