-
I want to thank all the members that have upgraded your accounts. I truly appreciate your support of the site monetarily. Supporting the site keeps this site up and running as a lot of work daily goes on behind the scenes. Click to Support Signs101 ...
Anybody see...............................................................................
- Thread starter Gino
- Start date
tulsagraphics
New Member
Yes. you attached a small photo when a much better version could have been posted. lol
tulsagraphics
New Member
They were in the process of dismantling.
tulsagraphics
New Member
It's okay, because the sign isn't "floating'. The sign was built on top of a steel "walk board"
Attachments
Johnny Best
Active Member
The Telegraph is an English newspaper, so no OSHA for them and probably London and needed fixing. Also has the star of David on the face, must have been owned by Jews.
bob
It's better to have two hands than one glove.
'THE' is read clockwise and does not lead into 'TELEGRAPH' which is counter-clockwise..'TELEGRAPH' needs to start at the upper right and proceed clockwise. The rest of it, the people hanging off the clock with no safety gear etc. are meaningless. At the time this photo was snapped there was no safety gear.
JBurton
Signtologist
I know what you mean, but that would be more of a perimeter lettering vs emblematic. I bet you like your clocks to show 9 at the bottom? Oddly enough, most numeric clock faces orient the numbers one way only, roman numerals fully rotate,
If that was true, they'd be more precariously balanced on an edge than that fellow on top...
tulsagraphics
New Member
I researched it before posting.
This is from a photography website.
In this black and white portrait captured in 1930, we witness a significant moment in the history of London's Fleet Street. The photograph showcases a group of dedicated workmen dismantling the iconic Telegraph Clock that once proudly hung outside the Daily Telegraph building at 135 to 141 Fleet Street. The image exudes an air of anticipation as the clock is being carefully disassembled, signaling the imminent remodeling of the historic structure. With its intricate details and timeless design, this magnificent timepiece has undoubtedly witnessed countless stories unfold on bustling Fleet Street. The men diligently carry out their maintenance work on this remarkable piece of machinery, showcasing their expertise and commitment to preserving London's rich architectural heritage. Their collective efforts symbolize not only their dedication but also highlight how essential it is to honor our past while embracing progress. Photographer Puttnam masterfully captures this poignant moment with his signature style, emphasizing contrasts between light and shadow that add depth to every detail. Through his lens, he immortalizes a fleeting instant where tradition meets modernity. This powerful photograph serves as a reminder that even though buildings may change over time, they remain vessels for memories and narratives that shape our cultural identity. It invites us to reflect upon the significance of preservation amidst constant evolution—a testament to both human ingenuity and reverence for history.
As referenced on several historical society websites: "The Daily Telegraph building became the Art Deco building in 1930, when a new clock was installed."
This matches up with the timeline.
A reference to a 1930s newspaper article related to the "missing" clock:
My favorite London clock: Daily Telegraph’s “stunning jewel-toned” Art Deco
The former home of the London Daily Telegraph is a 1928 Art Deco building of Portland stone. It features an Art Deco clock added in 1930. The building was designed by Elcock C. Sutcliffe with Tho…
suzassippi.wordpress.com
Also this: https://www.meisterdrucke.us/fine-a...City-of-Westminster,-London,-early-1930s.html
I'm no historical expert or anything... but given the above info, I'd say that yes -- in fact -- they were dismantling.
Heck, I was half tempted to sign up for a trial on a British newspaper archive site, but I figured the above info was convincing enough. lol
Last edited:
tulsagraphics
New Member
That sign install was only 5 stories up -- which is "nothing" back in that era -- compared to the old school high rise roughnecks.
(Factoid: The most notable roughnecks referred to themselves as "skywalkers" -- as in -- the Native American "Mohawks" (Kahnawakes) that used to work on them... until the early 1900s when Quebec's bridge collapsed. 33 Kahnawakes died, along with the "skywalker" tradition -- at least for a while. Later, they decided to split up the families on different jobs so that no single incident could wipe out an entire family.)
The "riveting gangs" of NY...
www.facebook.com
And this...
And this...
Or even more recently (1960s):
Do we call these guys fearless, brave, desperate or crazy? idk... That kind of work is no joke (and how some drank on the job is beyond me). 40% died, were paralyzed or severely and permanently injured. In any case, my hats off to 'em.
^ Fascinating AF
(Factoid: The most notable roughnecks referred to themselves as "skywalkers" -- as in -- the Native American "Mohawks" (Kahnawakes) that used to work on them... until the early 1900s when Quebec's bridge collapsed. 33 Kahnawakes died, along with the "skywalker" tradition -- at least for a while. Later, they decided to split up the families on different jobs so that no single incident could wipe out an entire family.)
The "riveting gangs" of NY...
67K views · 537 reactions | WATCH THESE BRAVE WORKERS RISK THEIR LIVES TO BUILD TWO OF NYC'S MOST ICONIC SKYSCRAPERS This rare colorized footage from the Smithsonian's American in... | By NYC Urbanism | Facebook
WATCH THESE BRAVE WORKERS RISK THEIR LIVES TO BUILD TWO OF NYC'S MOST ICONIC SKYSCRAPERS This rare colorized footage from the Smithsonian's American in...
www.facebook.com
And this...
And this...
Or even more recently (1960s):
Do we call these guys fearless, brave, desperate or crazy? idk... That kind of work is no joke (and how some drank on the job is beyond me). 40% died, were paralyzed or severely and permanently injured. In any case, my hats off to 'em.
^ Fascinating AF
Last edited:
JBurton
Signtologist
truckgraphics
New Member
The Daily Telegraph, in its early days, was owned by a Jewish man, a printer named Joseph Moses Levy. Today, it's owned by a bank (though which one is in dispute), and one of those banks is/are apparently shopping it around...Anyway, I don't even like climbing ladders anymore, much less hanging off of buildings. Brave men! I like signs, but not enough to fall off a building and die for.
Texas_Signmaker
Very Active Signmaker
Is Gino going to reveal what's wrong or leave us hanging... (Get it? Hanging, like those guys off the sign??) If you don't find that clever then you suck.
Johnny Best
Active Member
So the guy who started the Telegraph sold it to Joseph Moses Levy and hence the stars of David on the face..
Gino probably forgot he posted anything and forgot the answer to the question.
Texas_Signmaker
Very Active Signmaker
since im horrible at spelling... yes