Scotchbrite said:The squeezed versions are particularly annoying because there is an Arial Narrow option.
I think the tactic of these "designers" is to do as little scrolling in a font menu as possible. Arial is the default, so Arial is the choice for the layout! They might click the "B" button on the menu for "bold," or if they really want to put in a lot of effort they might select Arial Black in the font menu flyout.
The situation really aggravating these days considering there are so many other better options. Most graphics people have big collections of fonts that include far more versatile type families than Arial. Then if any type object needs to be squeezed or stretched a little or a lot there are plenty of OTF Variable fonts out there, some even for free. At the Google Fonts site there are OTF Var fonts like Archivo, Georama, Anybody, Saira, Roboto Flex and Roboto Serif (among others). Those have variable width axes along with the usual weight axis. The Anybody typeface can go really extreme from ultra compressed to very wide. Windows has the Bahnscrift variable typeface built-in; Segoe UI Variable is built into Windows 11. Adobe Illustrator has several variable fonts such as Acumin and (of course) Myriad.
I guess what needs to happen is Microsoft and Monotype need to create a variable version of Arial. But even if they did that it's very likely the people who've been artificially squeezing and stretching Arial won't bother to use the variable axis sliders. They'll just keep on doing what they've been doing with default Arial.