Hi all, I need to diversify my Acrylic fabrication business and feel adding a direct to media printer would be a sensible direction to head. However I am stuck in a continuous loop of pros and cons for both of these printers. The Arizona blew me away with the quality of the prints produced at the demo but the HP offers more flexibility in application and handles bigger panels. I think the HP is capable of producing better quality acrylic prints than I saw in a very rushed unscheduled demo but the adhesion on acrylic was useless and images not as crisp. Does any one out there have experience of both and can tell me which is a machine is better for my highly varied applications.
I love the HP environmental credentials but I’m concerned if I start doing a lot of splashbacks on acrylic or backlit acrylic panels I’ll regret it. Any advice appreciated.
I love the HP environmental credentials but I’m concerned if I start doing a lot of splashbacks on acrylic or backlit acrylic panels I’ll regret it. Any advice appreciated.