Used it a few times, The stuff simply just sucks.
3M is the choice of professionals.
we're professional, and use Avery.
It all started out with a, im tired of 3M and their crap thing,
then our installers really liked it. so yeah.
There ya have itwe're professional, and use Avery.
It all started out with a, im tired of 3M and their crap thing,
then our installers really liked it. so yeah.
but if it's all going to be this new LTR stuff we'll be switching back to 3M, which pains me because the regular 1005EZRS installs soooo much better than 180C.
There ya have it.
Having worked with all of the big three, (3M, Avery, Oracal) fairly extensively, The only thing that can or should be gleaned from this thread is that comes down to one thing... Personal preference.
I learned on Oracal 3951 (The original without RA) went from using that to using the EZ RS because price was much better. though I found it lousy to work with. Went to 3M and never looked back. < Personal Preference.
Having worked with all of the big three, (3M, Avery, Oracal) fairly extensively, The only thing that can or should be gleaned from this thread is that comes down to one thing... Personal preference.
I learned on Oracal 3951 (The original without RA) went from using that to using the EZ RS because price was much better. though I found it lousy to work with. Went to 3M and never looked back. < Personal Preference.
Actually just installed a wrap with this same vinyl, didn't even realize it was the LTR stuff until I saw this thread, it prompted me to look at the roll. It's definitely different than the regular EZ RS, bubble city and really hard to get them out. We love the regular EZ RS, but if it's all going to be this new LTR stuff we'll be switching back to 3M, which pains me because the regular 1005EZRS installs soooo much better than 180C.
Used it a few times, The stuff simply just sucks.
3M is the choice of professionals.
We are professionals. Not very constructive Mason. I have tried, 3m, Arlon and Oracal. I hated Oracal and Arlon because they were way too agressive for my liking. I also do all my installs on my own so it makes it very hard to drape the vinyl when it is so aggressive.
I am also not a big fan of primer. I would think if the product was up to scratch you would not need it and it would hold down well. I do like how the 3m prints and the lam is nice and glossy.
This is where the old avery came in. I can get a nice clean install with no primer and no failures. As a professional this is what I went with as I felt that it would give my cutsomers the best result. In Australia it is not that much cheaper than 3m so It was not a cost cutting exercise. Just my preference.
However as a professional I will probably make the switch back to 3m as I will always use what I beleive to be the best product for myself and my clients and the new product is not as good for me if it bubbles.
I didn't want this thread to become a 3m vs avery bashing, just some constructive input from fellow users about wether they had noticed a difference in the vinyl.
Thanks again to the guys that have posted helpful information. It has helped me in my decision of what to do going forward.
Cooky
Just opened 2 rolls of avery cast lam that has a splice about 5 and 8 yards through it.....
Just opened 2 rolls of avery cast lam that has a splice about 5 and 8 yards through it.....
They mark the splice, they're replacing the rolls.. just annoying.
A splice on laminate?
Only Avery...
That would look real nice at 19ft. on a 20 ft. print.