WildWestDesigns
Active Member
Now you have. I don't want to deal with Adobe files! ever.
Good luck with that endeavour.
Now you have. I don't want to deal with Adobe files! ever.
corel. they way the program works makes more sense. maybe illustrator can do more. the last time i fooled with it, which was a few years ago, i was confounded by out counter intuitive the layout was.
it seemed like i was making three moves in illy for every two moves in corel. became exhausted with the process and "regressed" back to corel.
i'm pretty sure i could teach my mom how to use corel draw. but illy would be a disaster. on the same note, i've taught my mom to use photoshop, yet corel photo-paint would be a disaster.
i really wish photo-shop would adopt a corel style custom tool layout. with all the dual monitors out there. we really don't need so much emphasis on collapsing the tools. we need to have more control over our workspace. i'd have buttons like burn, dodge, rotate, flip H, and flip V, levels, saturation, invert selection, ....... the list goes on.
Been working just fine for me these past 7 years.Good luck with that endeavour.
Been working just fine for me these past 7 years.
Now that someone pointed out that it's a Can. company I'm not that surprised now. I would say that statistically there is a better chance of that happening with you then not. I bet right at or less then 20% of the files that I get are out of Coral. I flat out won't except CDR files or whatever the native extension is now for Coral (I am thinking that they did change it, but I could be wrong), but the eps files from coral are about 50/50 success right. Those that it doesn't come out right I'm willing to bet are due to user error more then the software, but I don't know for sure.
I use Corel for everything but get alot of PDFs, EPSs from Adobe products. Over the years I've learned that I cannot trust my Onyx RIP with these files -- Adobe generated EPS and PDF files just are not reliable and often produce some aberration in the final printed product which does not get noticed, of course, until its printed.
However, EPS files generated by CorelDraw are almost 100% reliable through the RIP. Those that are problematic will generate an error, and that error is usually because of an element imported from an EPS or PDF (very likely Adobe-related).
I use Corel for everything but get alot of PDFs, EPSs from Adobe products. Over the years I've learned that I cannot trust my Onyx RIP with these files -- Adobe generated EPS and PDF files just are not reliable and often produce some aberration in the final printed product which does not get noticed, of course, until its printed.
However, EPS files generated by CorelDraw are almost 100% reliable through the RIP. Those that are problematic will generate an error, and that error is usually because of an element imported from an EPS or PDF (very likely Adobe-related).
Corel's EPS export is not great, ask your customers to export to AI and you'll have better luck. Especially if there are gradients, as gradients exported to EPS from Corel end up as clipped raster images instead of gradient filled vectors. Pain in the ass if it's something that needs to go to cut. Of course Flexi is worse with it's "export thin bands of clipped raster images that combined form a gradient" crap.
What on earth do you mean by this?Now that someone pointed out that it's a Can. company I'm not that surprised now. I would say that statistically there is a better chance of that happening with you then not. I bet right at or less then 20% of the files that I get are out of Coral. I flat out won't except CDR files or whatever the native extension is now for Coral (I am thinking that they did change it, but I could be wrong), but the eps files from coral are about 50/50 success right. Those that it doesn't come out right I'm willing to bet are due to user error more then the software, but I don't know for sure.
What on earth do you mean by this?
Not uppity... just incredulous. Canada is bigger than the US... We only have 1/10th the population of the US but it's spread over a larger area. To suggest that Canadians must use Corel more because it is a "local" company blows me away.That you've been able to not have to deal with Ai files (or adobe files in general) for 7 yrs, given that it's a "local" company. It probably really is pervasive in that area in general because of that and add to it that it's about what $200 cheaper (I'm not degrading the quality of the program by mentioning that). I'm sure those two factors help in making it more widely used up there.
No need to get uppidity. I didn't mean it in a negative way.
Not uppity... just incredulous. Canada is bigger than the US... We only have 1/10th the population of the US but it's spread over a larger area. To suggest that Canadians must use Corel more because it is a "local" company blows me away.
Never mind... I remember now... In Corel you click open and click the Ai file and it opens. It's a shame Ai doesn't have that function for Corel files. Sounds like quite a few of you would be able to use a feature like that.
I just did that with a CDR file that I had and it looks like crap. It will open it, but I wouldn't do it that way.
Same way with the "place" function as well.