Question Brightline Shield UV vs non-UV

[LearningTheProfession]

We have been using the standard Brightline Shield for some time now with no real complaints, but I recently noticed the UV protective alternative for a small price bump. We are operating in Florida where UV damage is a real consideration. If we could provide a better product for a nominal price bump, that's a no brainer.

Has anyone made this switch and noticed an improvement?


Thank you in advance for any advice.

 

[FireSprint.com]

Brightline Shield UV is General formulations 400. There isn't a huge cost difference but the end result could be pretty beneficial to your customer. I don't have any side by side testing, but I reached out to General Formulations to see if they do. I will let you know.

GF 400
http://www.generalformulations.com/getattachment/f28f2970-4b8c-4e82-9557-11d371d79456/.aspx
GF 100
http://www.generalformulations.com/getattachment/c8945264-fc8d-4565-ad99-6c5330219422/.aspx

 

[Goatshaver]

Agreed. I use the UV and the cost difference is very minimal in the end and the UV protection is worth it.