FlyingCharlie
New Member
I've been told that applying cut vinyl on vehicle glass will fail. Yet I see it all over. What ar the facts?
Thanks, FlyingCharlie
Thanks, FlyingCharlie
I've been told that applying cut vinyl on vehicle glass will fail. Yet I see it all over. What ar the facts?
Thanks, FlyingCharlie
Not sure who would tell you something like that. Cut or printed and cut vinyl lettering and graphics on vehicle glass is a core use of the medium. As with any substrate, you want to be sure to clean it before application and be sure to use a grade of vinyl that is appropriate for the intended life of the lettering.
...however, these types are illegal in almost all states on rear and side rear windows...
...however, these types are illegal in almost all states on rear and side rear windows.../QUOTE]
Interesting, since in every state in which I've lived one doesn't even need a functioning rear window as long as there are a pair of side mirrors. As for side windows, as long as they're behind the front seat they seem to be fair game as well. If these were not the cases then one might think that vast fleets of vans with but a windshield and a pair of side windows would be illegal.
Is that Perf Vinyl, Fred ??
Regular die cut vinyl or digitally printable vinyl on most glass will last for a long time, unless you have a wiper going through it, however, these types are illegal in almost all states on rear and side rear windows.
Perf Vinyl applied to a vehicle, generally does not last very long, regardless of where it is, unless it's kept indoors when not in use. There are exceptions, but even the manufacturers warn against durability.
Interesting, since in every state in which I've lived one doesn't even need a functioning rear window as long as there are a pair of side mirrors. As for side windows, as long as they're behind the front seat they seem to be fair game as well. If these were not the cases then one might think that vast fleets of vans with but a windshield and a pair of side windows would be illegal.
Generally, if a vehicle is manufactured without a rear window, then no rear view mirror is necessary, either, but then there is no window to discuss. However, if it has a window, it's not to be blocked with anything such as curtains, decals, lettering and other graphics hampering the visibility both in & out. If you are backing out of a driveway or anything where you would need visibility in case of a small child or some other living things might be obstructed with whatever it is you have blocking your vision. In addition, an officer of the law has been blown away many times by people not seen as he/she approaches from the rear. This blocking the view has been the culprit many times.
While it might seem fair game or useless information, I'm not going to break the laws I know. If I can save one life, by not lettering something I know to be wrong, I can... as someone said in another thread, sleep at night.
...If I can save one life...
A depreciated version of the Slippery Slope fallacy. "If doing X will save just one life..." is a favorite of politicos selling some agenda or another. Almost as good as the insipid "It's for the children".
First, it very much depends on the nature of X and just whose life is being saved.
Second, any reasonable limits are discarded. "If by spending $1 we might save one life" vice "If by spending $1,000,000,000 we might save one life". The former is probably reasonable, the latter no so much. How much is merely increasing the probability that some life somewhere will be saved actually worth?
What are you willing to give up to alter the probability? Money? How much? Is there a limit? One of your rights? Which one? More importantly, at what point would you not be willing to contribute to changing the probability?