Letterbox Mike
New Member
I thought I'd post up a quick thread about this, it seems like a lot of people are considering moving from a JV3 or JV33 to the GS6000. We just installed the Epson yesterday next to our JV3 and JV33 so I thought some may be interested in our initial thoughts and a side-by-side comparison...
OVERALL BUILD QUALITY
The GS6000 seems to be fairly well built. I noticed a couple things that seemed a little flimsy, and I wish more metal was used on the case instead of so much plastic, but overall not too bad. I think Mimaki wins out here though, the JV33 seems a bit heftier and more "industrial" feeling. Barely though.
MEDIA HANDLING
Mimaki wins easily. The Epson has me worried. Media loading is clunky and difficult. There is no pinch roller lever in the back like the Mimaki has, so you have to feed a bunch of media through the front so it doesn't slide back as you're running around the printer to drop the pinch rollers. Also, Mimaki has that wonderful little device on the feed rollers that helps you take out the slack in a roll as you're loading it, ensuring it's perfectly straight. This is missing on the Epson, and we're finding it fairly tricky to get a roll perfectly straight.
The Epson's roll holders on the back look like they'll fall off any minute. And the take-up reel is, well, interesting. You absolutely cannot beat Mimaki's beautifully simple takeup reel. Epson's is overengineered and hard to operate in comparison. It's also hard to get adjusted perfectly in line with the printer platen, and if you've read about these printers you know they don't handle full rolls well if they're not dead level.
MAINTENANCE
Hard to say this early in the game, but from the looks of it, the Epson will be very similar in maintenance to the JV33. I do LOVE the fact that they put a mirror down below the print heads over at the cleaning station, that's pretty ingenius. Epson also included a handly little oiling tool to help oil the slider bars, which will make that job a little less messy.
OPERATION
It's nice to have a manual that's not in "Japanenglish", so I give Epson kudos there. The manual is simple and easy to understand, but I actually wish it had a bit more in depth information.
It's probably too early to say for sure, but so far, I'm finding the Mimakis a little easier to use, but that's probably because we're thoroughly familiar with them. One thing I haven't seen on the Epson is a way to adjust the media compensation on the fly, it seems it has to be done from the RIP before the print is started. I can't believe there's not a way to do this, but if there's not, that's a major flaw with the Epson, being able to adjust media comp. while printing long rolls is critical. We're already experiencing headaches with this. If anyone knows how to do this please let me know!
PRINT QUALITY
This one's pretty easy. Epson wins here. Don't get me wrong, our JV33 prints pretty damn good, but the Epson is definitely a bit better. It's not "in a different league" as some would say, actually, resolution-wise, the prints are pretty identical. The Epson uses the wave pattern so that helps disguise any banding which helps tremendously. Of course, the color gamut is a lot nicer on the Epson too, we did some side-by-side prints and some of the rich reds, greens, and especially oranges definitely look better on it. For us, the increased speeds with less banding are the real improvement over the Mimakis.
FINAL THOUGHTS
Overall the Epson is definitely a nice printer. I'm more than a little concerned about it's ability to perform as a production machine. The media handling from feed to takeup leaves a lot to be desired. But it produces top-notch prints about twice as fast as our JV33, and about 4 times faster than our JV3, so that may make up for it.
Ultimately, had I not been offered this machine for slightly less than a JV33, I would have gone with the JV33. Looking back, right now, I'm on the fence about the decision, part of me wishes this was another Mimaki. Time will tell if this is a good machine for production, or if it's media handling will be too big a hurdle to overcome.
On a side note, we also upgraded from Onyx Postershop 7.3 to Onyx Production House X10 and so far we're all highly impressed with the changes. It seems rock solid stable and noticeably faster all around, from just switching screens to actual RIP times. Thumbs up for this one.
OVERALL BUILD QUALITY
The GS6000 seems to be fairly well built. I noticed a couple things that seemed a little flimsy, and I wish more metal was used on the case instead of so much plastic, but overall not too bad. I think Mimaki wins out here though, the JV33 seems a bit heftier and more "industrial" feeling. Barely though.
MEDIA HANDLING
Mimaki wins easily. The Epson has me worried. Media loading is clunky and difficult. There is no pinch roller lever in the back like the Mimaki has, so you have to feed a bunch of media through the front so it doesn't slide back as you're running around the printer to drop the pinch rollers. Also, Mimaki has that wonderful little device on the feed rollers that helps you take out the slack in a roll as you're loading it, ensuring it's perfectly straight. This is missing on the Epson, and we're finding it fairly tricky to get a roll perfectly straight.
The Epson's roll holders on the back look like they'll fall off any minute. And the take-up reel is, well, interesting. You absolutely cannot beat Mimaki's beautifully simple takeup reel. Epson's is overengineered and hard to operate in comparison. It's also hard to get adjusted perfectly in line with the printer platen, and if you've read about these printers you know they don't handle full rolls well if they're not dead level.
MAINTENANCE
Hard to say this early in the game, but from the looks of it, the Epson will be very similar in maintenance to the JV33. I do LOVE the fact that they put a mirror down below the print heads over at the cleaning station, that's pretty ingenius. Epson also included a handly little oiling tool to help oil the slider bars, which will make that job a little less messy.
OPERATION
It's nice to have a manual that's not in "Japanenglish", so I give Epson kudos there. The manual is simple and easy to understand, but I actually wish it had a bit more in depth information.
It's probably too early to say for sure, but so far, I'm finding the Mimakis a little easier to use, but that's probably because we're thoroughly familiar with them. One thing I haven't seen on the Epson is a way to adjust the media compensation on the fly, it seems it has to be done from the RIP before the print is started. I can't believe there's not a way to do this, but if there's not, that's a major flaw with the Epson, being able to adjust media comp. while printing long rolls is critical. We're already experiencing headaches with this. If anyone knows how to do this please let me know!
PRINT QUALITY
This one's pretty easy. Epson wins here. Don't get me wrong, our JV33 prints pretty damn good, but the Epson is definitely a bit better. It's not "in a different league" as some would say, actually, resolution-wise, the prints are pretty identical. The Epson uses the wave pattern so that helps disguise any banding which helps tremendously. Of course, the color gamut is a lot nicer on the Epson too, we did some side-by-side prints and some of the rich reds, greens, and especially oranges definitely look better on it. For us, the increased speeds with less banding are the real improvement over the Mimakis.
FINAL THOUGHTS
Overall the Epson is definitely a nice printer. I'm more than a little concerned about it's ability to perform as a production machine. The media handling from feed to takeup leaves a lot to be desired. But it produces top-notch prints about twice as fast as our JV33, and about 4 times faster than our JV3, so that may make up for it.
Ultimately, had I not been offered this machine for slightly less than a JV33, I would have gone with the JV33. Looking back, right now, I'm on the fence about the decision, part of me wishes this was another Mimaki. Time will tell if this is a good machine for production, or if it's media handling will be too big a hurdle to overcome.
On a side note, we also upgraded from Onyx Postershop 7.3 to Onyx Production House X10 and so far we're all highly impressed with the changes. It seems rock solid stable and noticeably faster all around, from just switching screens to actual RIP times. Thumbs up for this one.