Awesome, thanks man. Which one produces better looking prints in terms of color, print quality, etc
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
Onyx is your answer.
Are you running 12.2? The newer onyx's are adding features to make it less clicks. With custom quickserts, 90% of our workload is done by clicking one thing. Same with Flexi, though. Onyx is adding more options / etc so you don't need to go into job editor... It's getting better.
As for which prints better? I imagine they're all equal. The only difference would be color wise... Are you going to be making your own profiles? If so... Onyx has been often thrown around as the best for profiling. I haven't profiles on Flexi yet, so I can't compare the two.
Any benefit to using Flexi for design/cut and Onyx for rip/cut server?
Flexi, from what I've heard, does true cut nesting. So it'll nest and save material - Where as onyx nests by bounding boxes.Any benefit to using Flexi for design/cut and Onyx for rip/cut server?
Lets put it another perspective.
How do you find the design aspect of it? We use illustrator for everything (And photoshop). I can't see a rips design being as good as adobe products. Does it have any benefits compared to adobe, other than free?
I'll try flexi cloud tonight and give a more "Experienced" view. Kind of interested in how Flexi does nesting. So from flexi is ok. It's just the little things I'm used to in onyx, that flexi doesn't have (Because of base version, not because Flexi lacks them).
I think it's like Adobe illustrator VS Corel Draw. Both work just fine, both have a few key points people love / can't live without... But in the end, both will produce the same results, just in a different way. There is no wrong choice.
If your latex does onboard profiling like the 360 does then you don't need profile generation in the RIP.