Welcome To Signs101.com: Largest Forum for Signmaking Professionals

Signs101.com: Largest Forum for Signmaking Professionals is the LARGEST online community & discussion forum for professional sign-makers and graphic designers.

 


  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hand painted lettering WTF

Discussion in 'Fonts and Typography' started by stoliker, Sep 17, 2018.

  1. stoliker

    stoliker Member

    157
    4
    18
    Aug 30, 2010
    Michigan
    This is hand painted but I am sure its a font. Anyone know it?
    Thanks!
     

    Attached Files:

    Tags:
  2. shoresigns

    shoresigns Very Active Member

    1,463
    264
    83
    Nov 1, 2011
    Vancouver, BC
    Might be loosely based on a font, but this looks like a rookie freehand job. Judging by how butt ugly it is, it's unlikely they used a pounce pattern of an actual font, if that's what you were thinking.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. unclebun

    unclebun Very Active Member

    Love the repaint job on the C
     
  4. tlgsurvey

    tlgsurvey New Member

    7
    3
    3
    Aug 24, 2018
    Springfield, Illinois
    Sort of like Perpetuta Regular font.
     

    Attached Files:

  5. Nine3

    Nine3 Member

    38
    1
    8
    Oct 13, 2016
    Glen Avon
    I modified a font called Cambria and managed to come up with this. I didn't match the C's top and bottom outer serifs on the photo since it seems to be a different style compared to the rest of the letters, the "R" doesn't seem to be the same style either but I did match that one. I hope it helps!
     

    Attached Files:

    • Like Like x 1
  6. signbrad

    signbrad Member

    350
    156
    43
    Jun 15, 2014
    Kansas City
    These letters were hand drawn and then painted. This is the way most lettering was done before computers, though this job does look amateurish and was probably produced by a beginner.

    Drawing letters by hand, and from memory, was a skill that every apprentice letterer learned. A roman letter like this example was usually not based on a typestyle and the word 'font' was unknown in sign shops before computers. The letter styles used by sign painters, called alphabets in the lettering trade, were constructed to be highly readable, especially from a distance. Sign painter alphabets did not slavishly imitate printer's typestyles.as a rule unless it was at the request of an insistent architect or client. Many of the printer's versions of roman letters, such as Times Roman, for example, with its hairline strokes, would have been considered unsuitable for most sign work.
    Although extensively used today on computer generated sign work, letter styles like Times are inherently weak and lack visual impact. A sign lettered in all Times Roman has an anemic look. It's too white. Roman letters produced by journeymen sign painters were typically more robust, with thicker thin strokes and serifs. This was not always the case, but it usually was, at least as I remember it. And a good sign painter could modify a roman letter to fit the situation, adjusting stroke and contrast, height, width, and so on, as needed, without yielding the awkward look of a computer font that has been stretched or compressed artificially.

    Times Roman looks fine at the small sizes common to print. But then that's what it was designed specifically for—newsprint held at arm's length.

    Brad
     
    • Informative Informative x 3
  7. stoliker

    stoliker Member

    157
    4
    18
    Aug 30, 2010
    Michigan
    Thank you all for the help! So much info to be learned from you all. Once again its greatly appreciated!
     
  8. Gino

    Gino Premium Subscriber

    32,504
    2,075
    113
    Jun 7, 2006
    PA
    In addition to what Brad has said, I don't think that sign was up all that long. I too, think the letters were traced and then filled in by brush as certain letters still have the same short serifs and characteristics, other than the 'C'. If this had been a mask, you would not see the wavey straight edges, so an unsteady hand seems to be the culprit. Also, the lack of fading/seeing any brush strokes at all, is odd. However, there are patches of peeling lettering paint, which also indicated a not-so-good prep job. So the lack of brush strokes, but peeling letters, tends to make it less than 10 years, if not even less. Also, being a novice painter, most people who hand-painted had the old secret/crutch of using tape to keep edges straight. Obviously, this was not utilized.
     
  9. jimbug72

    jimbug72 Member

    315
    56
    28
    Oct 25, 2008
    South Carolina
    Can't tell for certain from the picture, but if I had to venture a guess expanding on the observation of Gino an others it looks like it was done by hand by an amateur, but I'm thinking it WAS done using a mask since there re no brush stroke fades and those lines & corners look too crisp to match the ineptness of the lettering. I' guessing they drew/traced the lettering onto the mask then cut it out by hand with an exacto knife and then painted. That or the person who made it is really good at painting really bad signs...
     
  10. signbrad

    signbrad Member

    350
    156
    43
    Jun 15, 2014
    Kansas City
    Good observation. The square serifs do look a little too clean to have been produced by a beginner's brush.
     
Loading...

Share This Page

 


Loading...