Well, there goes that...
All you did was ask for constructive criticism with no criteria on what we could comment on. Since website design is content, it's only natural to comment on your work,which is part of the website.
If I could tell you how to double your sales in a year would you do it? Some comments may be rude, but a few people took time and were well thought out "straight talk" comments that could be construed as rude. Maybe they are saying what is actually on their mind because in this unfiltered environment, you can. There is a benefit to that.
It's possible that even though your work sold, you can do better work and get paid more for it and have even happier customers? You can benefit from your portfolio comments.
This as posted some years back:
This is from another site where we have issues with varying crit styles and heated debates on how to critique and what is good design. If you think we are bad here, there are designer forums that are brutal..... These are NOT rules on critique...just a guide to help those to understand what is being presented and I'm sure it is way too much to read and apply here but it helps in knowing how to present a logo fro crit than just here is a logo, critique me....
1) Demographics/Audience (Who are you trying to reach?)
2) Industry Focus (Is this for the tech sector? Timber industry? International markets? etc.)
3) Details on printing, displaying or finishing the project (e.g., foils, spot color, billboard, point-of-sales materials, etc.)
4) Maybe a few questions or problems you've been struggling with...what are some things you like or don't like about this particular project.
Client/Project Briefing;
Who is it for? (or) What is it for?
What is their prime product or objective?
Who is THEIR typical clientele or main demographic?
How does (or will) your work aid this client?
...any special circumstances that may enhance the knowledge base for the designers participating in the critique.
Preliminary Concepting;
It's a much smoother process if posters can see where the work has come from. Just how far has it traveled. Not always, but most times that will be a tell-tale clue as to how much depth was given to concept and proper shaping of the ideas involved. Tossing a half-baked concept and work product to the wolves will start a feeding frenzy. It is highly advised that sketches and first attemps be posted along with the work you wish to have critiqued. Did I mention sketches?!
Work Product;
Do not start with the final iteration of your work. You are too tied to it at that point and will possibly be less inclined to take even the best suggestions. Come to the Crit section only half done and still molding and shaping your work. It's easier to see where changes and improvements could be made. And you might even be on the right track and posters can green-liight you and send you on your way.
Finally,
Check the Ego;
After all is said and done, you the main poster, came to this section looking for help and opinions from design professionals, many of which are quite skilled and proven many times over. Don't get upset for getting what your signed on for. While it is agreed that no one should endure disrepect or derogatory actions and behaviors, a critique is a water test that requires a bit of tearing down to build up. Not up for that...simply don't post.