It seems that the meaning of my earlier comment has been somewhat misconstrued by at least one of our forum participants (no doubt due to my limited skills as a writer and the hasty way in which the message was composed), to which end I feel obligated to offer clarification:
I am not blaming the rich as the cause of income equality. It is baked into our capitalist economic system. Whenever there is risk, there will be winners and losers, and the larger your "stack" the less risky it is to cover your bet. It goes without saying that the most fortunate among us will have a leg up compared to those starting with little or nothing. Thus it is, and thus it always has been.
My contention that how this is perceived informs our actions is based on observations on how other countries with capitalist economies deal with the problem of income equity. Most other developed countries have much more vigorous social support programs in place, along with a stronger reliance on community and family support. America is unique in that we still harbor the myth that anybody can raise up from the dirt and become economically successful if they work hard enough, save money, and live prudent lifestyles. This thinking was exacerbated after WWII during an unprecedented period of prosperity, during which time a person could, provided they were white and male, get a good paying job, save money, live prudently and have enough money for a comfortable retirement. Modern political and economic pardigms have changed that calculus, and in this increasingly competitive world we need to adjust our expectations and dispel the myths of "Horatio Algier" and American exceptionalism. We need to face the modern economic and social realities, becoming in turn a stronger country where we, its citizens, can live with dignity, humility, and without fear.
Somewhat related but I watched this documentary last night on PBS, which likely trigger even more inaccurate, perception driven comments about laziness, god's will, etc. but just a horse to water, you can lead an idiot to knowledge and not make him learn anything. We've never had a true meritocracy and those we perceive as lazy, unmotivated, etc. have simply not had white privilege at their disposal or faced the kind of impediments to success many others have.
It detailed the history, challenges, roadblocks, mass discrimination, violence, etc. that blacks have faced since being drug here in chains. After slavery and gaining their freedom, blacks throughout America attempted to gain financial independence and exhibited great success at being entrepreneurs and business owners. With that success, pushback from whites in the form of outright violence, disruption and other unamerican activities created huge problems for black entrepreneurs. There were riots and other actions taken to where entire black communities were burned down just to kneecap their progress and eliminate competition. Reconstruction had its own built in, legal (at the time) laws to inhibit and control freed blacks as well as other laborers.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulsa_race_riot
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicago_race_riot_of_1919
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_Summer
https://www.howardzinn.org/labor-da...yd1byZrhp0HTvXsV0sRlnLVmERiVyezJ_IwpgaysmXNeE
Anyone who thinks that we've always operated under a strict meritocracy where all it takes is hard work, effort and motivation is unaware of the legacy of our history. That history applies to all races, creeds, etc. I'm sure every once in a while a coal miner in West Virginia has managed to rise up and buy a few mining claims, but for 99% of them, it's a tough life with little upward mobility.