Stacey K
I like making signs
Not to mention, if the apocalypse happens we know which houses to raid!
-
I want to thank all the members that have upgraded your accounts. I truly appreciate your support of the site monetarily. Supporting the site keeps this site up and running as a lot of work daily goes on behind the scenes. Click to Support Signs101 ...
Is your shop prepared for the upcoming barter system?
- Thread starter Signarama Jockey
- Start date
Texas_Signmaker
Very Active Signmaker
GAC05... he has all the shells
Signarama Jockey
New Member
If this thread irritates you, you can always just ignore it. Simplest thing in the world. Just look at something else. If you're genuinely not interested, then don't participate.
Hope that helped!
Gino
Premium Subscriber
Here we go again..... putting words in someone else's mouth.
* Where did I say this thread irritates me ??
* Where was it mentioned I must listen to you ??
My last post just outlined you are either dumb or lucky. I did not refer to you as being knowledgeable whatsoever, so I don't think I need your suggestions.
Did THAT help ?? You seem to have a problem with comprehension.
Last edited:
WildWestDesigns
Active Member
Aaahhh yes, the joys of text based only communication.
Although with regard to being irritated/tired with the topic etc, I would have speculated the same thing with: "...and up, and up, and up." That does seem to allude to that (rather intentional or otherwise). Had that last phrase not been there, I wouldn't have thought about the poster being irritated. That may have been an error on our part, but I could easily see why that was thought.
When there are so few "tells" to go off of in the communication, words used are mulled over just as much as what was explicitly said (or lack thereof). At least in my experience. That does leave room for error, but I think quite a few people do that rather intentionally or not, although with varying levels of success.
Although with regard to being irritated/tired with the topic etc, I would have speculated the same thing with: "...and up, and up, and up." That does seem to allude to that (rather intentional or otherwise). Had that last phrase not been there, I wouldn't have thought about the poster being irritated. That may have been an error on our part, but I could easily see why that was thought.
When there are so few "tells" to go off of in the communication, words used are mulled over just as much as what was explicitly said (or lack thereof). At least in my experience. That does leave room for error, but I think quite a few people do that rather intentionally or not, although with varying levels of success.
Last edited:
Gino
Premium Subscriber
Not sure if you had a point wild or just agreeing or disagreeing, but suffice it to say, when I said..... and up over & over, it was because it was true on the OP's part. He started this thread about 6 months ago and just keeps regurgitating the same thing every so often. I didn't want anyone to misinterpret my thinking he did it once or twice, but countless times. So, is he dumb or just lucky ??Believe me, something as silly as this thread and most of it's content is hardly spellbinding, so I find it like about 99% of the others....... entertaining, not irritating. If I was irritated so easily, I wouldn't be here at all.
WildWestDesigns
Active Member
That does more and more read like irritation. But again, without inflection, it's easily missed.
Rather it's this topic or countless of others that have "beaten the dead horse", I personally would just unsubscribe from the thread and that way there is no new notifications on it. And if the op brings it up in several different new threads (rather hijacked or ones that he started on this topic), block the OP. Based on your other assessments of the OP, I don't see why that would be all that big of a deal, unless in some way, you like that type of "conflict", I dunno. To each their own.
I don't think "easily" was mentioned. "Irritated" yes, but not "easily". At least not in my direct response or in the quoted part of your post that I was referencing. Any earlier, I don't know. Most people do have breaking points, even with ones that have superb patience.
Gino
Premium Subscriber
I guess like clinton wanted the definition of "IS", for his lies... the definition for irritated needs to be defined for you two guys. My writing that is simply because he did it so often, as if everyone under the sun missed his speech the first 20 times. He just keeps coming back with the same stories and ya know what they say doing the same thing over means.
I said easily, referring to myself, therefore it didn't need to be introduced by someone else. Maybe this is a debate, maybe it's just BS going round & round in circles going nowhere as this thread.
WildWestDesigns
Active Member
Yes, irritated I think would be appropriate.
But again, ignore, either mute the conversation and/or mute the OP. Typically these things aren't isolated in one thread (I know from what I speak, having done this on oh so many threads). Having said that, I don't typically mute people (maybe conversations), only one that I can recall muting was some parody account that another user had (well known, but can't remember the user, don't think that they are around anymore) and it was on the vary annoying side, but I digress.
I know it was referring to you, but no one said that you were easily irritated in this instance, that you were just irritated. It doesn't necessarily have to have been done easily. And not to say that it is or isn't wrong to be so.
Or a little bit of everything. Typically after 11 pages, things have all the way around gone there course and have had too many divergent "issues" come up that it isn't the same beast.
Gino
Premium Subscriber
Actually, you're becoming irritating with your constant attempt(s) at telling me what I'm feeling. What you're doing is irritating or annoying, but what the OP was doing was beating a dead horse, which now I feel like I'm doing, which you oughta know a lot about horses, huh ??
So, I take it, your way of thinking is if someone says something more than a few times, you're irritated, regardless of the subject, so you think I am also. but I'm saying the person is just repeating him/herself needlessly to get a point across which is of very little interest to anyone, except a dummy or someone who got lucky and is bragging. It's commonly called the 'look at me' syndrome.
I hope someone posts a picture of a cartoon of beating a dead horse to end this thing.
Oh, and please do not tell me what I should be doing.
So, I take it, your way of thinking is if someone says something more than a few times, you're irritated, regardless of the subject, so you think I am also. but I'm saying the person is just repeating him/herself needlessly to get a point across which is of very little interest to anyone, except a dummy or someone who got lucky and is bragging. It's commonly called the 'look at me' syndrome.
I hope someone posts a picture of a cartoon of beating a dead horse to end this thing.
Oh, and please do not tell me what I should be doing.
Texas_Signmaker
Very Active Signmaker
notarealsignguy is volunteering to dressup like a horse playing dead... he likes when people beat him with a stick.