is that in order to turn on/off you need either a remote or you have to reach around back of the unit. Or just leave it on, which is what I do.
Most of the TVs that I have dealt with either have them on the side or in the front. They tend to also not be the hard tactile buttons like they used to be.
However, the nice thing about screens nowadays as the need for turning off to keep images from being "burned" into the screen is not quite the same as it once was, so thankfully making sure that there is a screen saver going or turning off isn't a priority as it once as.
I realize that a TV doesn't have the precise resolution of an actual monitor but I've never, as in ever, found that to be a problem.
I guess this would depend on which ones you get. I had some, that just didn't render like a monitor and it felt like it was a TV/Movie focusing on a computer screen. Back in my triple monitor setup days, I had used a TV and that was strictly for streaming entertainment (be it thru my local NAS or thru some streaming service).
But that is just me.
I would imagine though that perhaps the 4ks, even TVs probably wouldn't notice that much of a difference though. The aforementioned TV was a 720 Samsung (before I went in on Viewsonics if it wasn't a Wacom).
I'm laying out signs here, not reproducing the Sistine chapel ceiling. The upside is that a TV costs half or less of an equivalent sized monitor. You can get an insanely large screen for not a lot of money.
The only real downside, and this is more me putting on my tin foil hat, is that alot of TVs are becoming "smart TVs" (not all, but it certainly seems like more and more are, especially around here and I just try to pick something off the shelf) and I just don't think that they should be. At least that's the way it seems with regard to the decently made/priced TVs. Due to that, I have actually gone with monitors instead of TVs for use as TVs. If I want "smart" functionality, I will hook up a PI or a NUC and call it a day. Atleast I would have more control over everything.