• I want to thank all the members that have upgraded your accounts. I truly appreciate your support of the site monetarily. Supporting the site keeps this site up and running as a lot of work daily goes on behind the scenes. Click to Support Signs101 ...

Not a sign sign, but a sign of the future!

signswi

New Member
yeah those little guys are cool and all, but rip a massive **** anywhere near them and they will loose formation and flight characteristics QUICK.


wind is a mother to small aerial vehicles. no way these would work outside a lab.

edit: this site just **** out F A R T

good god.

They'd do a lot better than a miniaturized human pilot in each one. Computer controlled adaptive fly by wire systems sample air characteristics magnitudes faster and better than we ever could. The F-22 isn't even naturally stable, without the computer it would be unflyable (you could argue it still is...).
 

ProWraps

New Member
They'd do a lot better than a miniaturized human pilot in each one. Computer controlled adaptive fly by wire systems sample air characteristics magnitudes faster and better than we ever could. The F-22 isn't even naturally stable, without the computer it would be unflyable (you could argue it still is...).

many fixed wing vehicles are inherently unstable. that is what allows them to fly past the envelope. systems are created to compensate for the lack of reaction by the pilot. just as systems are created for this type of device. which i dunno may be able to compensate.

but at what cost. focus on the task at hand, or focus on stability in a hostile enviro.

but you are comparing a fixed wing vehicle to a rotor vehicle that relies on stability negative of outside factors which are magnified by size/scale, or in this case, lack of it.

size/scale, or lack of it, is the killer for these small machines.
 
Top