My company was just recently forced to switch from Fiery 4.5 over to Onyx 10.1. So far I've been less than impressed. We just did a time trial compairing both and Fiery just blew it out of the water on RIP speed as well as ease of use/ability to manipulate files easily.
So far, Onyx is slow and cumbersome compared to RIPs like Fiery and Versaworks. We are running Onyx on dual quad core Xeon CPUs with 8gb of ram and 3 15k SAS drives and the performance is still sub par. Rotation and sizing needs to be done in pre-flight and requires re-rendering each time. I'm able to rotate and size in Fiery on the fly without re-rendering previews. I'm also able to move objects around when nesting in Fiery and that's not possible in Onyx. We have about 1.5 million sq. ft. of graphics to print this year and I'm extremely worried about Onyx being able to handle it. Right now I can print faster than I can rip, and that's a big problem. I'm not impressed.
I've heard nothing but great things about Caldera.
dsmskyline ,
Great to hear that you are ripping files much faster with tiff files on the Onyx. I will have to try that! So far we've tried only .jpg and some .pdf files. Been too busy with all the other issues to try much else, but now I can look at experimenting with different file types. Geesh!
My Onyx Trial is about to expire. Hope they can extend it again for me.
My company was just recently forced to switch from Fiery 4.5 over to Onyx 10.1. So far I've been less than impressed. We just did a time trial compairing both and Fiery just blew it out of the water on RIP speed as well as ease of use/ability to manipulate files easily.
So far, Onyx is slow and cumbersome compared to RIPs like Fiery and Versaworks. We are running Onyx on dual quad core Xeon CPUs with 8gb of ram and 3 15k SAS drives and the performance is still sub par. Rotation and sizing needs to be done in pre-flight and requires re-rendering each time. I'm able to rotate and size in Fiery on the fly without re-rendering previews. I'm also able to move objects around when nesting in Fiery and that's not possible in Onyx. We have about 1.5 million sq. ft. of graphics to print this year and I'm extremely worried about Onyx being able to handle it. Right now I can print faster than I can rip, and that's a big problem. I'm not impressed.
I've heard nothing but great things about Caldera.
I have a feeling this is a very dumb question but. . .We have Fiery RIPs for our digital printers. I have assumed that those RIPs are not workable for our wide format work. We are running an old UV flatbed (with equally antiquated RIP) and plan to upgrade soon, and assumed we needed a new RIP, Onyx or Caldera, but I'm not crazy about the learning curve. Is there a possibility that our existing RIP(s) can be used instead?
Thanks.
Learning curve is pretty small on both RIPs, if you can use a computer you can learn them pretty quickly. How deep you'll get into it depends on your level of technical color management knowledge and your experience with various workflows but both can be run very simply. The first software RIP I used was EFI Micropress for high speed digital copiers, learning Onyx years later (after being out of print for a while) was no big deal.