I agree. However, I sent him this first to get a feel for what he's thinking, and he said it was far too obvious. I'm still trying to figure out where he's at. That's why I'm posting here - in case I can't figure him out!Not a thing about that says photography. The concept is there as far as the background being the lens but I had to hunt to figure out that is what that was ... Customers should not have to figure out the logo. Try to talk the guy into something a little more recognizable. The end of a lens is essentially a circle with gradient effects to look like glass. We recently did one similar to this but for a property management company.
I agree. However, I sent him this first to get a feel for what he's thinking, and he said it was far too obvious. I'm still trying to figure out where he's at. That's why I'm posting here - in case I can't figure him out!
I like that idea! I'm waiting to see where he stands on the lens idea. If he likes it I will take the time to refine it to look like it should. If not - I'm going to try that!what about using the aperture look instead of just a gradient?
Ihe said it was far too obvious.
As the various lens/camera icons have likely been done to death, why not just try a signature type of logo?
A logo does not have to be "obvious" to be memorable....
I agree with Colin.. much like construction company's have little houses on their logos and beauty shops have bad Nagel knock off image on it, photographers have lots of iris, shutter and camera images on them. Colin's idea semi-reminded me of this site... http://www.dansidorphotography.com/ done by Honest Bros.... if you go to their site, you will see the identity design. http://www.honestbros.com/ (second row down, 4th image from the left)
I think the actual term I would be using is "literal" logo design. Literal logo design is a sign shop specialty. Literal logo design but does not always make for clever or memorable logo design. If you are gonna do it, make it clever.
I tell clients if I have to slap an icon by logotype there is either something wrong with the business name, their clients or them.... this is a no brainer... if a person can not read "photography" and figure out what they do, do they really want them as a client?
You might be wasting a lot of your clients time. (and the forums time) You might want to think about a deign brief, instead of designing by hurling a design against a wall and seeing what sticks... crap is what usually sticks. Never... NEVER show your client crap. 2 problems may arise.. one is you may look unqualified, the other might be that they pick a crap idea.
I might still be wasting everyone's time including my own, but I was inspired and came up with this conceptual crap.
No, I didn't. I'm sorry if I sounded condescending.I'm thinking you missed the point....
I use jobs that may or may not pan out to focus on more as a potential portfolio piece than anything. If a customer is washy about things and extends my efforts beyond what my time or their $ is worth to my "free-time"- I get something in my personal portfolio.