I agree with you 100%, maybe gasoline or jet fuel vapors, but NOT Eco-Sol ink, who's very name says it all "ECO" = meaning environment friendly, right?
Actually I don't think that is what they mean by "eco" when it comes to ink. That means economical, so called eco-solvent inks are really no less environmentally less friendly than full solvent inks. They just have a weaker or a slightly less aggressive solvent which makes them less stinky is all. The VOC's are not good for you regardless. I think as far as thinking of it as your shops air quality, being the "environment" and odor being what is unfriendly then yes, maybe in that context they are more environmentally friendly. As far as being more earth friendly, in that context they are no more environmentally friendly than full solvent inks. Its the same pigments and on both and once the solvents evaporate they are basically the same. We run full solvent Triangle inks. I looked at the MSDS and I do think the below is meant to indicate working with the exposed open liquids for the most part. The entire ink system is a sealed system, we do not use open bulk ink tanks, the bulk ink is in sealed bags. I'm not going to go to the extent of replacing the light switches and whatnot in the room but the below does give me some pause in considering looking into a sealed motor (explosion proof) type exhaust fan. That being said, after over 10 years of using an inline exhaust fan for our printers I have never had an issue and the exhaust fans built into the printer itself as well as the switches and relays in the printer are certainly not explosion proof. I'm thinking of it now from more of an insurance liability standpoint. What "if" something did happen, would the insurance try to deny a claim because of the type of exhaust fan used? Some bits from the MSDS for the inks we run...
"Ignition temperature: 536°F)
Auto Igniting: Product is not self igniting.
Danger of Explosion: Product does not present and explosion hazard.
Store and use away from heat, sparks, open flame or any other ignition source. Use explosion-proof electrical (ventilating, lighting and material handling) equipment. Use non-sparking tools. Take precautionary measures against electrostatic discharges. To avoid fire or explosion, dissipate static electricity during transfer by grounding and bonding containers and equipment before transferring material.
Engineering measures : Use only with adequate ventilation. Use process enclosures, local exhaust ventilation or other engineering controls to keep worker exposure to airborne contaminants below any recommended or statutory limits. The engineering controls also need to keep gas, vapor or dust concentrations below any lower explosive limits. Use explosion-proof ventilation equipment.
Fire fighting instructions :Combustible liquid. In a fire or if heated, a pressure increase will occur and the container may burst, with the risk of a subsequent explosion. The vapor/gas is heavier than air and will spread along the ground. Vapors may accumulate in low or confined areas or travel a considerable distance to a source of ignition and flash back."