heyskull said:
How can I educate customers with the Raster and Vector?!
There is no easy to get it into their heads. Every one of these amateurs has to learn the hard way.
I see the same thing over and over again. Someone emails a copy of their "logo." The file is basically the first JPEG image they find on their computer or on the Internet. We respond asking for vector artwork. They reply by putting their JPEG image inside a PDF, AI, EPS or SVG container file, thinking that will convert their crappy JPEG into vector format. Sometimes we'll get a CorelDRAW CDR file with the JPEG image stuck in there. A few of these rookies will auto-trace the JPEG image and then send that.
"It's vector now!" Yeah, but it still looks like $#1T.
It's almost like a joyous
on-vacation feeling when a client emails clean vector-based artwork with no technical issues (such as live type objects that cause missing font issues). That means I don't have to waste time doing things to fix client artwork so it can go into production.
The SVG format has been around for over 20 years. The leading web browsers have supported SVG for what seems like a decade at least. Yet JPEG and PNG images are still used far more often for web graphics that could rendered better in SVG. If the SVG format was more routinely used in web development we probably wouldn't be seeing so many of these stupid JPEG logo images from clients.
Boudica said:
Print what they send you, and they will be incentivized to understand and learn.
A bunch of these people wouldn't notice the difference. They would think the fuzzy or pixel-jaggy looking graphics are normal. They don't understand what passes for "professional quality" or just something that doesn't look like crap. Details mean nothing to them.