I'm not sure why so many discussions here need to devolve into a pissing match of ideas where each response is dissected and attempted to be nullified or rebutted, but it is what it is.
It's not a pissing match (at least not with me). When people make claims about something, they should be able to defend it. Pure and simple. Make a claim, should be able to defend it to the best of "your" ability.
This method has kept me from being a victim when people tried to BS me on things and that includes in business as well. It's not a pissing match. I always try to keep an open mind, but to me, my mind has to be swayed with reasoning. I do question things.
If I'm a lifelong chef, why would I want to stake my investment capital and workday routine in a business type I know nothing about?
People do it all the time. Even when getting into their 1st trade that they have an interest in. Most people (at minimum 51% of the time) don't actually do proper research. Don't have a business plan etc. I'm not saying that applies to you or anyone else in this thread, but I would say most do not do the research.
I remember one member of a trade group that I'm in wanted to add sublimation to their lineup (which fits in nicely with this type of work that she and I do) and was asking about if she should do it or not. I asked do you know what your ROI is? How much business would you get with this new service? Have you tried to outsource and offer this service to your customers to gauge interest?
Other members thought I was too negative for asking those questions and I never did get a response from that individual, so I would assume it was "no" to those questions. Less then a year, her machine and suppliers were up for sale in the group. Not the whole business, just what was related to sublimation.
I see that more often then not. Now granted that is just my experience. But if it happens in industries that people
should know, I'm fairly sure it will happen when people try to branch out as well.
Excitement and a go get'em attitude tends to get the better of them.
As far as the a value for the existing archives of work files, I'd say without them, there is ZERO point in buying an existing sign or graphics business. In my OPINION they hold a significant and crucial value to a new owner.
Equipment, land, patents, get rid of competition etc. Not all the time, but I would say that other considerations do exist.
And if "you" are getting rid of competition, odds are closer that the old customers would come to you anyway.
WITHOUT the existing client list and work files, the skill level of the new owner takes on even more importance because that person will essentially be starting from scratch and only has the business name, built in identity and location exposure to connect it to the community.
Even if you get the work files/customer list, shouldn't this be assessed in case those things
not panning out well during the research phase? Question if "you" do have the ability to start from scratch or a contingency plan if that doesn't work the way that "you" hope that it does?
I'm odd in the fact that while I'm a business owner (and that does have a high degree of risk to it), I'm also hugely risk adverse. I try to think of at least 1 contingency plan in case something goes south, but doesn't take the whole ship with it.
Not every business sale occurs to those that are failing or even in a downward slide.
I didn't say that they did. I was only mentioning that do to the explicit mention of the failing business that your wife took over (not when she left it, but when she took it over). That is all.
I was generalizing about restaurants and their recipes just to cite an example of things that could and do get transferred to a new owner. Aren't there restaurants in your area that have changed hands but very little about the operation changes for either better or worse?
As far as the restaurants that I go to in the area that I'm in now, no. While some may keep the same theme, in a small % of the time, but the menu is changed. It's not the same. Sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worst. A lot of time, the building is demolished and a new one is put up.
Now, in my hometown there was one of my favorite pizza joints (Pizza Casa, if there are any viewers from the Plano Tx area that were around there in the 80s and early 90s) and a lot of the recipes (not all) did change to the new owners, name was kept the same as well. Same building and decor as well. They closed within a year. It tasted exactly the same. But my family also knew the original owner and we went there so much that we actually got special privileges that others didn't (delivery (none was offered), had a tab and a significant one at that etc). That didn't carry over to the new owner. Now it's quite possible that it would have failed anyway, I don't know what was going on in the background.
Small businesses where owners are front and center, some of that loyalty comes about what that individual owner does all the way around. When that owner goes, there is a high probability that things will change, even if other things remained the same.
The initial menu was offered but gradually phased out in exchange for homemade everything with an emphasis on freshness and made from scratch appeal. The place turned into a go to spot. She doubled revenues in the first full year and grew them 10-20% every year for the next five years. Being a hands on owner, she craved a less demanding schedule and sold the business close to its peak, not on the downslide.
So, is it quite possible that the recycling of the old menu during that initial phase could have not been done and still have achieved the same level of success? I would argue that the old recipes weren't as valuable as one would think considering y'all went into a different direction with the menu.
Based on you saying that "it turned into a go to spot", having changed the decor and the menu from the original helped. What would have happened if you kept the decor and kept the menu?
Now, slowly changing and not doing a total about face could have been the key.
Again, things aren't static.