-
I want to thank all the members that have upgraded your accounts. I truly appreciate your support of the site monetarily. Supporting the site keeps this site up and running as a lot of work daily goes on behind the scenes. Click to Support Signs101 ...
Setting for large JPG
- Thread starter Colin
- Start date
Custom_Grafx
New Member
Bi-Cubic.
Especially if it's tiny when you bring into VW and you're letting VW enlarge it.
Especially if it's tiny when you bring into VW and you're letting VW enlarge it.
Colin
New Member
No, it's a large 7 MB file. Still Bi-Cubic?
Custom_Grafx
New Member
When you drop it into VW. What is the size at when it's 100% in VW?
I doubt 8x4.
I doubt 8x4.
ChicagoGraphics
New Member
7 mb is a large file?
Ponto
New Member
Configuring the interpolation used for scaling
Select the interpolation to use for scaling from the [Interpolation] list. The characteristics of the interpolation settings are as follows:
Nearest Neighbor
Lowest quality, but the processing speed is high.
Bi-Linear
Standard quality and processing speed.
Bi-Cubic
High quality but low processing speed.
...and there you have it in a nutshell.............
JP
Select the interpolation to use for scaling from the [Interpolation] list. The characteristics of the interpolation settings are as follows:
Nearest Neighbor
Lowest quality, but the processing speed is high.
Bi-Linear
Standard quality and processing speed.
Bi-Cubic
High quality but low processing speed.
...and there you have it in a nutshell.............
JP
Colin
New Member
The file I received was 7 MB. It wasn't perfectly shaped to a 4x8 (a tiny bit out), so I brought it into Photoshop CS 5.5 and cropped it to 48.37" x 96.25" (inches), so VW isn't re-sizing it.
Colin
New Member
It's 5178 x 2602 px. I see that since cropping in PS, it's now 14 MB.
Colin
New Member
53 dpi.
GAC05
Quit buggin' me
If you figure 72dpi at 4x8 you are pretty close with 5178x2602.
If the image is sharp at this original size going up to 4x8 is not going to degrade it very much at all. It would depend on what the image looks like.
What are printing on, banner - vinyl?
I'd go with bi-cubic and call it a day with the small re size you are looking at.
wayne k
guam usa
If the image is sharp at this original size going up to 4x8 is not going to degrade it very much at all. It would depend on what the image looks like.
What are printing on, banner - vinyl?
I'd go with bi-cubic and call it a day with the small re size you are looking at.
wayne k
guam usa
Colin
New Member
Correct, it's not that large, but considerably larger than the 600x400 px images that many people provide.
Custom_Grafx
New Member
It's only slower in the RIPing, not the printing.
GAC05
Quit buggin' me
I don't run versaworks so I don't know but with that new win7 machine of yours I don't think the time difference would be much of an issue.
Coroplast is not exactly a fine art mounting material - I'd hit the print button and turn my attention to something more pressing... Like President Obama's plans to build a tunnel under the border into Canada.
wayne k
guam usa
Coroplast is not exactly a fine art mounting material - I'd hit the print button and turn my attention to something more pressing... Like President Obama's plans to build a tunnel under the border into Canada.
wayne k
guam usa
Colin
New Member
Building a tunnel sounds as difficult as digging a bridge.
:Big Laugh:Big Laugh:Big Laugh
Mosh
New Member
Send them to VW 25% and scale up. looks good for a realty sign. Realtors are hack customers looking for cheep for the most part anyways! looks at it from 50 feet not right up and it looks GREAT! Learn the ropes or get the "x" from the ref and not get another job from that booker.