I'm not offended one bit... are you? You keep bring up girlfriends, seem
you have some issue with that. At first I thought maybe your designer
was your girlfriend... now I know who you really are. Bringing my boss
(not my girlfriend) into this is very telling. But you already knew that in an
attempt to invoke a response.
Pretty pathetic, even more is having a minion join in, or are you the minion?
I was not looking for a fight. I just came in as a newbie on this forum and posted something and I start to get Aesop quotes and thread highjacking.
To start over with you guys, I inherited a house with a carriage house attached with some extra cash tacked on. So I thought I would take the jump and start my own business. Purchase a new printer and a laser printer and have the shop in the upstairs and the printers and tools downstairs.
I understand now why there is not much posting of logos and ideas here but the wealth of knowledge of printers seems where I will devote my time. Did not realize there was a click here and if I did not drive the right car or wear the right clothes I would be singled out. So to show that I do have thick skin I will post one more for the entertainment of the "seasoned" designers.
And Rick, the monkey suit video explained a lot. I am sorry for offending you and your girlfriend.
http://www.signs101.com/forums/showthread.php?107033-New-Direction&p=1113300#post1113300
Learn how to hide your digital signature better...
Who is the master, and who is the apprentice?
Not for your benefit Joseph, but hopefully someone can actually learn something...
You posted to get comments, how about taking it in, discarding whatever
is crap, incorporating whatever you feel is applicable. Just remember,
you may not know enough about it to distinguish what is good, and what is
bad information.
I'm actually trying to show you how to design in the fastest way possible.
Your first logo wasn't all that bad. But what are are showing after is
worse. There are actual reasons your logos have issues, and it has nothing to
do with taste. My comment on what you can't see is you have to learn to be
self-critical. How does this communicate? Is it legible, will it look good
on a business card or stretched across a tractor trailer? Can I see genitals
in the logo? Does it pass the squint test?
Many come here searching and spending hours, days, weeks and months
trying to figure out the correct printer. What to get, how they work... and
spend little or no time learning about how to get it done. It does not take talent
to make a decent logo or layout, but for sure it does take skill.
Most of us don't sit here and bang out logos and layouts, we have a process,
get inspired, look at videos, learn, buy books and magazines and re-learn the
skills needed. Being on this and other design forums, I get wanting to get into
the business, creative release, you want to make a ton of cash, fell into some
money or credit gets extended.... all decent reasons. As a businessman, I
don't understand spending $40-60,000 on equipment that requires some level
of skill to get it to work properly and we are entrusted by our clients to be
visual experts in some form of another.
To me, you are what's going to sell your work, your logo/business card/website
tells your client who you are in your absence. You want the best statement you
(or your designer) can muster up.
Now lets take the DDC logo...
It's a basic logo that works on anything. It's not a great logo by itself, but it's
how he used it as a brand that makes it good. It also has a reason it's designed
that way, if you watched anymore work by Mr Draplin, you will find out he is a
huge fan of early commercial art, mostly of the 40's - 60's. Early commercial
artist made things simple, they didn't have that many full color spreads at the
time, it was quick, dirty work. And it communicated. If you had taken the time
to see his work:
http://www.draplin.com/work/
and go through the client list, you might see how the process he shows on the video
works for him... are they all great? No! But the body of work is AND he has developed
his skill (and a small amount of talent)
-------
The bowling logo is basic: the idea of it comes from the commercial design/googie
design era. There is a reason it's designed that way... mostly because the building is
googie architecture. What makes that plain logo work really well was the sign design
and how everything else tied together. I don't care about your criticism of it because
I don't think you know enough about google architecture, or early/retro design to
comment on it. I'm not trying to get an emotional response from anyone here, I'm trying
to get one from people driving by the sign.