Raum Divarco
General Manager CUTWORX USA / Amcad & Graphics
I have been having some inquires lately about the structure of training for new equipment like printers and digital cutting platforms.
I am looking for some insight from the community on what works best etc.
When you get something new, do you prefer canned training programs?
Does it work best to just supply process documents (help sheets) when there are inquires?
What are you looking for?
What is the best approach to inexperienced operators on equipment like flatbed cutters?
Is it better to start slow to build confidence with machines?
General operations of all these systems are generally easy and straightforward.
Blades slice and cut as a simple displacement cutting process.
Router bits cut and carve as a subtractive process that can be complex sometimes.
I wanted to know form General and Middle Management what their thoughts were on this as well as users/operators.
For reference, i choose to start slow with the basics and assess user groups individually.
Over time I add more processes and complexity to the directions as the users become more confident with operation.
While I can understand certain viewpoints on expediency in a operators training, I don't get to choose who runs what/where.
I do get to choose how I want to handle teaching in a way i feel is the most beneficial and least likely to result in incorrect operation.
thanks,
I am looking for some insight from the community on what works best etc.
When you get something new, do you prefer canned training programs?
Does it work best to just supply process documents (help sheets) when there are inquires?
What are you looking for?
What is the best approach to inexperienced operators on equipment like flatbed cutters?
Is it better to start slow to build confidence with machines?
General operations of all these systems are generally easy and straightforward.
Blades slice and cut as a simple displacement cutting process.
Router bits cut and carve as a subtractive process that can be complex sometimes.
I wanted to know form General and Middle Management what their thoughts were on this as well as users/operators.
For reference, i choose to start slow with the basics and assess user groups individually.
Over time I add more processes and complexity to the directions as the users become more confident with operation.
While I can understand certain viewpoints on expediency in a operators training, I don't get to choose who runs what/where.
I do get to choose how I want to handle teaching in a way i feel is the most beneficial and least likely to result in incorrect operation.
thanks,