It's likely not cheap either, it costs us $700 a pop to get rid of waste paint. Make sure to also check the quantity because over a certain amount will require you to have a haz waste ID # and with something radioactive I would bet the number is low. Essentially you step up from a conditionally exempt small quantity generator to the big leagues and you do not want that.They are regulated for use and disposal on the federal level. You don't want to be the last one known to have custody and not have any documentation of what happened to them. And like Notareal said, keep the documentation filed away.
There are companies that take them for disposal or recycling, Veolia is one that we've used in the past, contact them, or any other hazardous waste disposal company in your area, or the manufacturer (they'll sometimes take them back for recycling). Get any cost associated, and add it to your quote/ bill.
Glad I wasn't the only onegot my head spinnin now thinkin about the kinds cool signs I could make with Tritium scraps encapsulated in resin. I'm already living under a 5g tower, so what else could go wrong?
Let me post this again for ya. Straight from the NRCFrom what I read, Tritium signs aren't hazardous. I wonder why they have so much regulation.
"EXIT signs that glow in the dark often contain a radioactive gas called tritium. These signs do not require electricity or batteries and can be used where it is hard to install electric signs, such as above doors. They serve an important safety function by marking exits to be used during power outages and emergencies. The signs pose little or no threat to public health and safety or security...Tritium, also known as 3H or H-3, is a form of hydrogen. In EXIT signs, tritium gas is contained in sealed glass tubes lined with a light-emitting compound. The tritium gives off low-energy beta radiation that causes the lining to glow. This type of radiation cannot penetrate a sheet of paper or clothing. If inhaled, it leaves the body relatively quickly. Tritium gas is odorless, colorless and tasteless, and is lighter than air."
I don't know what in the world you read in order to get your info on things but this is from the EPAFrom what I read, Tritium signs aren't hazardous. I wonder why they have so much regulation.
"EXIT signs that glow in the dark often contain a radioactive gas called tritium. These signs do not require electricity or batteries and can be used where it is hard to install electric signs, such as above doors. They serve an important safety function by marking exits to be used during power outages and emergencies. The signs pose little or no threat to public health and safety or security...Tritium, also known as 3H or H-3, is a form of hydrogen. In EXIT signs, tritium gas is contained in sealed glass tubes lined with a light-emitting compound. The tritium gives off low-energy beta radiation that causes the lining to glow. This type of radiation cannot penetrate a sheet of paper or clothing. If inhaled, it leaves the body relatively quickly. Tritium gas is odorless, colorless and tasteless, and is lighter than air."
So you read what you wanted to hear and stopped? It's called context, "The signs pose little or no threat to public health and safety or security" key words here: little and public health. You are arguing with fairly common knowledge. Like with the last discussion, you fail to realize depth. What about the trash guy who gets stuck loading 50 of these broken things after a major renovation or the shop goon (is that you?) that likes to smash them when they chuck them in the dumpster? It's just like asbestos, it poses no imminent risk to the public but to anyone that has to work with it or dispose of it faces a real problem in the long term. Same with benzene in gas, general contact won't hurt you but daily prolonged contact will.Yeah, the quote I posted was from the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. I guess I was taking them at their word when they said "The signs pose little or no threat to public health and safety or security." and "If inhaled, it leaves the body relatively quickly."
...but what would they know about regulating nuclear material?
I'm sweet (or so says texassignmaker), Gino is salty (also per texassignmaker). You made a statement not a question unless I missed something. I don't question my sanity very often but this is throwing me for a loop.You two are still salty.
I simply asked a question; not even that - I just wondered.
I thought that we buried the hatchet. Why are you trying to pick a fight?
I said: "From what I read, Tritium signs aren't hazardous. I wonder why they have so much regulation."I'm sweet (or so says texassignmaker), Gino is salty (also per texassignmaker). You made a statement not a question unless I missed something. I don't question my sanity very often but this is throwing me for a loop.