Okay, its another round of the professional sign makers, versus "hobbyists" and amateurs discussion. So I'll just paste in a good magnum opus post.
:Big Laugh
Here's my stand:
I make no secret about my feelings on the subject. Sign making is a profession. It demands real artistic talent, visual problem solving skills and real professional graphic design skills. The best sign makers are usually people who invested in four year art school degrees, bought their software legitimately and worked lots of hours to pay their dues to justify working in this industry.
I completely disagree with the mindset that sign making is somehow a democratic field that anyone should be able to join. That would be like saying anyone should be able to play in the NFL. It should take a lot more than just the purchase of a vinyl cutter and some cracked software to start a vinyl business.
On the terms "hobbyist" or "amateur," such terms are supposed to go to people who make vinyl items for themselves or friends and charge no money. When you start charging other people for your work you are trying to work as a professional and therefore should live up to some professional standards. Those standards include paying for legit software, being an avid student of graphic design and constantly trying to improve the quality of your work.
Almost all other professions demand proven competence in their respective fields before a new worker is allowed to start practicing that trade. Everyone from plumbers to lawyers has to pass some kind of test, earn some kind of certification or even a degree in order to start working professionally. Sign people, and most graphics people in general, are for some retarded reason exempt from such a process.
It's pretty annoying at times when someone visits this forum and announces something to the effect, "I just bought a vinyl cutter and some software to start a sign business. Can you guys help me design my first logo? I don't know what I'm doing."
Anyone making such statements has no business running a sign business, much less working for one. Sorry, but that is a fact. If you don't know what you're doing then you have no right to charge people for your work or get paid for it as an employee. A sign designer who charges other people for his work should already demonstrate some expertise in graphic design.
I invested over $50,000 in my four year art school degree. I have worked in the sign industry for over a decade, and worked in other graphics oriented fields before that. I have spent thousands of dollars of my own money on software just for my own use; nevermind the countless thousands our company has spent on software, equipment, computer systems, vinyl cutters, routing tables, etc. With all of that investment, why should I be accomodating others who want to join this industry when they dodge any formal training and not even want to pay for legit software? I have even less incentive to be accomodating when some of those folks turn into new competitors. Those new, unqualified guys are only arriving on the scene to further downgrade my standard of living.
As it stands, the profession of graphic design has deteriorated to a level not a couple steps above minimum wage burger flipping. If I knew things eventually would become this way 20 years ago I probably would have tried hard to pursue a different trade or profession.
That's my stand on it.
Now to comment on a few things posted.
bob said:
I have often toyed with the idea of writing and placing in the public domain a universal hasp key emulator. It's really quite simple to do and I admit to being suffciently perverse as to enjoy giving the finger to these people, especially to the hotbed of arrogance that is Scanvec-Amiable.
You realize doing such a thing is a federal felony, correct?
Flexi, EnRoute and other applications in the Scanvec/Amiable family are industry specific programs. Hobbyist people have no business using them. There is a limited number of professional users that need apps like Flexi. The development cost of that software is amortized out over the number of users. The pricing is completely fair, not "grossly overpriced."
If Flexi had the user base of Photoshop, then FlexiSign Pro would cost only $500. But it doesn't have that user base, and never will (and probably shouldn't either).
Random said:
I'm sorry; unlike most of the people I've seen in your industry, I'm trying to deliver a quality product to my customers at an affordable price.
Usually that sort of thing is a paradox. The folks charging bargain basement prices on vinyl graphics usually offer bargain basement quality to go along with it. Acts of font murder abound, as well as trademark infrigement and other head scratchers. IMHO, anyone who sells cartoons of Calvin from the Calvin & Hobbes cartoon peeing on a given car company logo is a foolish idiot. Same goes for those who cut and sell unauthorized Harley Davidson vinyl logos and more. But that is the speed of many vinyl shops offering "the cheapest price" and operating out of their garage.
Rick said:
There are a million vinyl hacks and hobbyist around, when they find a professional board and talk about high cost and rip-off sign shops, I am amused at what little they know, yet voice such a strong opinion. I do not get offended, what do they really actually know about the business to get so riled up about.
I think nearly all of them also miss the point of professional responsibility. To add to that, there's lot of people working in the sign industry, some for a long time, who don't do competent work. Yet they want to charge small or large amount of money for poor quality work.
The sign industry does very little to police itself. The only things are offering to enforce any standards at all are coming from the high end. A growing number of states are demanding sign companies that do any electrical sign work to meet various qualifications in order to practice their trade. Many have to earn electricians licenses and do work that is UL Listed. That may have an effect of enforcing higher work standards that filter over into the design aspect. The long shot hope is some of that may finally filter down into the non-lighted "fast signs" area of our industry.
It is about time for this country at large to get rid of the extremely stupid mindset that the computer is creating the artwork and that one only needs to hire the person willing to work for the least amount of money. The emphasis should be on proven professional level talent. When that becomes the commodity then the commercial landscapes in the United States might stop looking so bad.