RachelKelly said:
I'm trying to get into 3D representations for isometric renders in the web based Sketch-Up, but trying to make a building in there look similar enough to the client's is kicking my butt. I'm not committed to buying a licenses for any 3D software until I learn enough to atleast show a channel letter or illuminated cabinet on a building.
This is just my opinion, but unless the sign project is worth a lot of money and the design of the sign is unusual in some kind of sculptural way, it's going to be a big waste of time and effort creating a model of a building on which the sign is installed in full-blown 3D.
Just about all the sketches I see from other sign companies and other firms creating sign designs just create 2D views. They'll either super-impose the sign design on a photo of the building. Or they'll use CAD-like 2D views of building elevations.
I often go the latter route. I'll sometimes work from CAD files provided by the customer to create better looking color versions of the building elevation (with closed shapes). Sometimes I have to create the building elevation art from survey measurements of the buildings. I think it's pretty clunky to merely plop imagery of signs on top of building photos. The images are never going to be accurate to scale due to optical effects of perspective. Plus embedded photos can inflate the crud out of file sizes. I'll go with the photo method if something has to be done
quick and dirty.
Elwood Woody Smith said:
i have been in marketing/design/printing for over 35 years and it has been the most used for the past 25. Corel seem to be used allot by sign shops. Which was a surprise to me, because no one in marketing or design has used it for 20 yrs. But if it works, go for it.
I've been using CorelDRAW and Illustrator side by side since the early 1990's. They both have their strengths and weaknesses as well as specific pitfalls for moving certain kinds of artwork from one app to the other.
CorelDRAW is very good for sign design tasks. It's tools, certain keyboard shortcuts and other features make it work very well for technical drawing tasks. One specific example is its shortcuts for aligning and distributing objects: R-L-T-B-C-E keys, add shift to distribute. Illustrator has nothing like that.
And I haven't been able to create any similar custom keyboard shortcuts like that in Illustrator either. Not only do I have to open the Align panel in Illustrator to align/distribute anything, but I also have to press an extra click to make one object stay in place for others to align to it. CorelDRAW can also align text objects to other objects via their baselines. I've been begging Adobe to add that to Illustrator for some time.
I can't live without Illustrator for other tasks. Illustrator's pen tool is vastly superior to the one in CorelDRAW. The keyboard shortcuts associated with its pen tool as well as shortcuts for zooming in/out and hand-panning the view make it far easier/faster to do things like hand digitize clean vectors over other artwork. Illustrator's CPU/GPU preview provides a much smoother appearance when using features like animated zoom or hand-panning the view. The zoom/pan views in CorelDRAW are more herky-jerky.
Illustrator has far superior integration with Photoshop. CorelDRAW cannot paste AICB vector paths or shape layers into Photoshop.
A great deal of corporate artwork is generated in Illustrator. Just today I had to so something involving the UPS full color vector logo. That thing does not work at all in CorelDRAW due to all the gradient mesh effects in the logo. Other Illustrator-related effects won't translate to CorelDRAW. Free-form gradient fills aren't compatible. Most art brush and pattern brush effects have to be expanded before sending to CorelDRAW. Certain kinds of transparency and masking modes on artwork won't translate right. Whenever I receive AI, EPS or PDF art files from clients, especially larger corporate ones, I'll open the files in Illustrator to see what's going on with the artwork before attempting to port it over to CorelDRAW for more technical-oriented design work.
I can go on and on with more examples of each application's pros and cons. I just try to use the best of both applications for getting my work done.