Search results

Yes, I understand presenting emotional responses is SO MUCH easier and entertaining than actually dealing with actual facts. To each their own.

"The context Some of Clinton’s emails now made public actually show Clinton’s team talking about how they couldn’t email each other classified information over the private server and instead have to move the conversation to a more appropriate venue. Clinton has said she viewed classified...

Nope, blinded by the FACTS. All you have presented is EMOTIONAL, not factual. AGAIN, I have not and am not supporting Democrats, so you've committed more emotional errors.

And Republicans let them get away with this. Happens all the time to get the main target. Yes, Republicans for Hilllary's entire adult life. So AGAIN, either willing conspirators or incompetent fools. Nope, there are clearly emails stating how classified info should not be...

One man's funny is another man's sick and twisted. And you are being SO GENEROUS with your cost numbers...but I understand you are only counting current cost IN DOLLARS, not human tragedy and only Iraq. 'It was also an update of a 2011 report the Watson Institute produced ahead of the...

So they are in collusion AND incompetent. Look, if they had sufficient evidence, they could go to the public through their bully pulpit, if only.....

They certainly could if they substantiated the CLAIMS, with sufficient evidence. So they have had at least 8 years for Obama. And pretty much all of Clinton's adult life. So which is it? Are they completely incompetent? Or in collusion?

So again my question: Are Republicans totally incompetent running the Senate and the House, the investigative committees, the investigative sub-committees, etc or are they in collusion with the Dems in a conspiracy?

Of course, I understand how the bully pulpit works. The Republicans have spent enough tax dollars investigating the Clintons without demonstrating such 'crimes' as you claim were actually crimes worth prosecuting. THAT makes the 'failure' or conspiracy to get Hillary elected, is still...

Then with the Republicans in charge, why no trials for these 'crimes'? Seems Republicans are more to blame for letting her get away with such 'crimes'.

Yes, let's hold them to the same standards "Trump has built a cottage industry around stretching the truth. According to POLITICO’s five-day analysis, Trump averaged about one falsehood every three minutes and 15 seconds over nearly five hours of remarks. In raw numbers, that’s 87...

Why is the Presidential Bar set in two places for the same office, one bar is apparently about ankle high so he can just take a step and he is over, while the other appears over her head, requiring a pole to vault over? Again, I cannot support either, but this whole idea of two standards for...

"Trump has built a cottage industry around stretching the truth. According to POLITICO’s five-day analysis, Trump averaged about one falsehood every three minutes and 15 seconds over nearly five hours of remarks. In raw numbers, that’s 87 erroneous statements in five days." Read more...

https://priceonomics.com/post/457685...s-are-******** http://are.berkeley.edu/%7Esberto/De...ndIndustry.pdf In the diamond industry, by far, the largest 'wealth' is created by marketing - a service, not the diamonds themselves, or the true lack of scarcity, but by marketing to CONSUMERS.

When you have the power to DECREASE competition by actually writing the tax codes and laws in you own favor, you write them so that is very difficult for small companies to compete with you...

And yet it financed the US until the Income Tax ]Tariffs were the largest (approaching 95% at times) source of federal revenue until the Federal income tax began after 1913. For well over a century the federal government was largely financed by tariffs averaging about 20% on foreign imports...

I am failing to understand that. What is wealth without commerce? A 'market' of what? What is a market without consumers? "and humans place value on them." You mean a consumer market? https://priceonomics.com/post/45768546804/diamonds-are-********...

Tariffs just like most everyone else uses to protect their own economy. Called VATs now. Currently, the Mexican VAT rate within 10 miles of the US southern border is 11%. This compares to the national standard VAT rate of 16%. The discount is to help keep Mexican companies competitive...

Yes, CONSUMERS Again what is wealth without consumers? What is an economy without consumers? Without consumers to barter with, what choice does he have but let it rot? Again, I fail to see where surplus without consumers does generate wealth. Do you have examples?

Hence a surplus. Hence wealth? Let's say you have a monopoly on draft animal harnesses, you are the only one with a surplus, hence no commerce. It is not rocket surgery.