-
I want to thank all the members that have upgraded your accounts. I truly appreciate your support of the site monetarily. Supporting the site keeps this site up and running as a lot of work daily goes on behind the scenes. Click to Support Signs101 ...
Advise and Opinions
- Thread starter dakotasignwerks
- Start date
Fred Weiss
Merchant Member
I like either #1 or #2 ... #1 slightly better. #3 is a no go for me. Too hard to read and script typefaces aren't even being taught in classrooms anymore.
oldgoatroper
Roper of Goats. Old ones.
or LegoLand....
visually, #1 is pretty good, though, but could be a little more unified-looking
<edit> not sure if the attached would be better or not...
Last edited:
C
ColoPrinthead
Guest
I like the first one, second one is L7.
Signmaker1234
New Member
Top font, middle icon!
Johnny Best
Active Member
Marlene
New Member
the simple fix oldgoatroper did really made a huge change on #1 and I like. the name bothers me as it sounds like a knock off of legoland and the font you used looks like the one they use. I would suggest finding another font because of that. having a logo design for a logo designer look like like another's logo isn't a good idea
eahicks
Magna Cum Laude - School of Hard Knocks
LOL...we have a customer with a similar logo, I always refer to them as "L7"....
Attachments
Nix the script, I would say #2 but as eahicks pointed out, there is one familiar. What does your primary logo look like?
Circleville Signs
New Member
#1 has potential, but needs reworked.
Also, my initial thought with a name that sounds as playful as this, is that the logo needs to match that level of playfulness. #2 and #3 definitely do not do that.
Also, my initial thought with a name that sounds as playful as this, is that the logo needs to match that level of playfulness. #2 and #3 definitely do not do that.