I see in that msg that "Trump Advises", not mandates people take the vaccine. There is a significant difference between the two. People advise, this, that and the other. That's fine. Dictating, mandating are vastly different. People chanting "vaccine, vaccine, vaccine" like they are part of some cult, yea that's different. Typically when big decisions are involved (usually medical related, I get 2 or 3 opinions (and in the case of medical decisions, they are typically that of doctors, not personalities of some type/politicians) and then weigh my options, I don't just go with one, but "you" do "you").
I do find it strange that the FDA advisory board voted against booster shoots for those between 16 and 65 (65 and older, those that are high risk are different, bare in mind as well, Trump is past 65 (also bare in mind, Congress seems to be made up of Octogenarians, or close to it for the majority of them (I think 70%))), citing lack of data about safety and about value of mass boosters. That was a 16-2 vote.
I have to wonder about the 2 that voted in favor, did they work for big pharma or do they want to work for big pharma. I also have to wonder, if this will become another situation of vote until you get a yes due to political pressure (there is a lot of money to be made in this, sure supposedly for the masses it's free, technically it's not as with most things that the government pays for, but there is a lot of money)).
Y'all may think this is tin foil hatting, but I do go back to the "Perry Incident", also a mandated vaccine and he did end up saying that was the worst decision he made (rather or not he is actually contrite is something else, I do believe though it cost him 2012 bid) and if I'm not mistaken, Perry's Chief of Staff was a lobbyist for the pharma company.