@ Hotspur:
This thread is not about the Latex 3000, it is about the 360.
A 360 is a contone printer too, but the icc creation and icc storing is printer based. It is correct that the ICC will be applied to the contone file the RIP creates (not attached), but this ICC-Profile will be loaded to the printer (or will be created with the printers integrated i1, with calibration functionality on the printer itself), and will be synchronized to the RIP. No need (but of course the possibility) to do profiling in the RIP anymore.
Please refrain from mixing up printer models what leads to inaccurate sweeping statements - people visit these pages to gather pertinent information and posts like these are unhelpful in that aim. :Big Laugh
PS HP went for Flexi as they were prepared to give it away - Caldera and Onyx had products that were worth paying for ...
That is a totally stupid statement ... der is a lot of Onyx or Caldera OEM-RIP's out there too (mutoh have delivered their printers a long time with Onyx RIPCenter Mutoh Edition), and Flexi is no Freeware, HP needs to pay for it too. Of course it could be a decision based on costs because SAi had in their regular offers small budget RIP's since years (e. g. PhotoPRINT SE), but they won't do it if it won't work. Should be that Onyx and Caldera have bigger market shares with industrial printers, but the latex 310 and 330 where the software is delivered with are no industrial printers. FlexiPRINT have functionality for more than a decade which was added to Onyx in v11 just two years ago (e. g. unproportional scaling), and the handling of tiles or multiple page PDF's are still more enhanced than in Onyx (specially with FlexiPRO). And it is without a doubt the RIP what works with the highest grade of integration with the Latex 300, as it is the RIP with one of the easiest user interfaces on the market.
I will not blame Caldera or Onyx, they are nice products too, i work with both of them too, and all of them have their specific pros and cons.