Corel Here. but it's completely pointless to argue over this, the best design program is the one you are familiar with and can use the most efficiently!
Yup.do you think they have threads about "what's the best hammer" over at the carpenter's forum?
I think Adobe purposely makes it hard to import cdr files. Arrogant bastards.I can agree with you to a point. However, if you are the greatest person in the world with software that isn't accepted at most any other place, it doesn't do anybody a whole lot of good.
If 90% of the places use software X and you are proficient with software Y, either you need to find out how to convert Y into X as best as you can or you learn software X. Unless you are able to do everything in-house, then that cocern becomes a moot point.
I have never have received a good working CDR file. I don't know if that's an issue with the person sending me the file or if there is something wrong with software translation. Either way, it presents a problem for workflow. I'm about 50/50 with good working EPS files. Which lends credibility to it being a user issue, however, you would think that statistically I would have at least had 1 workable CDR file.
jiarby said:do you think they have threads about "what's the best hammer" over at the carpenter's forum?
The Adobe Suite is all that I have ever used. I do have painter on my computer, but other then opening it up to look at the GUI I haven't used it much at all.
Corel, Best for vector, Adobe best fro photos. As a vector program Adobe leaves a lot of invisible lines that are used to attach there art together, when that is put into a plooter those lines get cut just like any other and it leaves you wondering where it came from. They can only be seen in wireframe. With Corel they do not use these lines and are allways a much smaller file than their Adobe countrpart. We own both. But for ANYTHING vector we work in Corel, All Photo or full color styles we work with Adobe.. M*
I've never met one that didn't use an Estwing.