Go back and read what you wrote. Your comments about the iPad Pro and using it for drawing purposes were clearly dismissive. "When you're used to a 27" QHD it's on the small side of things." That sounds like enough of a dig against the iPad to me.
On my travel laptop, I use a 12WX. It is a solid product, it does it's job. I would say the exact same thing. It is on the small side of things compared to even the 21UX, much less the 27QHD. If people were to ask, at minimum I would suggest the 24 to 27" Cintics (I don't think they make the 22" anymore, certainly not the 21UX, I have the last of that generation).
The smaller Wacom is still a bang up product and I would say the same thing that I did with the iPad.
You didn't say anything positive.
I can say something positive, it would be irrelevant to the conversation, but it would be positive. I have always thought that iPads (and Apple products in general) had gorgeous screens. Still do. I love using my iPad for travel entertainment.
Accusing me of putting words in your mouth and then trying to walk back your comments as "fair and balanced" is a crock.
I try very hard to not "move the goal post", if that has occurred, then that is my bad.
Yeah, but clearly you don't respect my own preferences or that of a number of other participants in this forum.
Asking for backing up of claims is how I learn, if I'm wrong (and it wouldn't be the first time and certainly not the last) point out to where I'm wrong. If what you counter with doesn't reconcile with something else, show me that despite those counter claims, what is said is still kosher.
I know you don't have time to read and reply to everything I post, but that's part of the reason why I try to do the posts in the way that I do. I try to be as clear as I can be and with everything (at least at the time of the posting) to support that claim.
And it's almost always in a tone of correcting me, as if I'm some kind of newbie computer user rather than someone with over 30 years of experience.
See above answer with regard to the supposed tone (gotta love communication methods that don't convey inflections).
As far as years experience, I've used it on occasion, I try not to, because years of experience doesn't always convey a strong support of the claim. We would like it to, but things change, what was true isn't exactly the same, especially if one hasn't kept up with the times (I'm talking in generalities, not anyone specifically). As "we" get older, we tend to settle and not want to deal with keeping on with learning anything. That's not everyone, I'm over generalizing, but I would say more often then not (at least 51% of the time) that's true.
In some areas, things change so rapidly it's hard to keep up with everything.
For instance, my mom who was a programmer back in the 60s and who still uses Ps CS6 to this day, so that's ~50 yrs of experience with computers. What she knows, she knows well, but some stuff she hasn't kept up with.
So years of experience has it's pros and cons.
If anyone mentions having a work PC connected to the Internet you often respond to that with the same comment we've all seen 1000 times already.
Often that said post that I respond to usually is talking about update issues (which is pretty normal thing nowadays), malware, ransomware etc that has halted production. That default response of mine helps prevent that issue especially if one is using software that isn't dependent on the internet. If it's still applicable, I would think that it is still worth mentioning. Not much different then a lot of other posts that are mentioned over and over again. If the answer is still good, then it should be still worth mentioning. If it is no longer applicable, all the production software is subscription based with cloud functionality yada yada yada, then my default answer would be backups, backups, backups (true backups, what some think of as backups aren't really backups, but something is better then nothing I reckon).
Now, while I try to be a positive contributing member, if what I say is total bunk and not worth reading and has zero merit, there is always the ignore function. I would like to think that I'm not on the same line of posting as those that post "what they want because they can and it pleases them", but maybe I'm wrong. While I try not to be like that, maybe my execution of that falls all so very short.
