That's what I'm wondering. Since the marks are so close, it's compensating for any rotation of the media, therefore overcompensating on something so small.I guess the first thing I would try is to do like maybe 8 up and see if that makes any difference as possibly there is some confusion with the registration marks being so close together
Were you able to try a different blade holder. Something seems loose or blade is binding. Also try just cutting that shape on vinyl without registration marks. No need to print just to see if it will cut straight.Just to add I am printing these shapes with shape stroke 0.5 pt.
Yes I tried with new blades and two different holdersWere you able to try a different blade holder. Something seems loose or blade is binding. Also try just cutting that shape on vinyl without registration marks. No need to print just to see if it will cut straight.
The blade is not deep..force is just 5 and speed 20 and lastly I tried on printer paper for registration marks. it just scratch the paper.I went back and looked at the last photos you posted. Looks like the blade is set to deep and possibly the force as well. I would put some unprinted vinyl in and cut the shape starting with setting the force depth without the blade protruding and lower the blade in small increments (like 1/8 turns) until you can see a cut. Will it do it at the first sign of a cut?
I guess we should ask what blade, angle and what holder?
I was talking about Condition 3/3 #4 Blade Adjust.The blade is not deep..force is just 5 and speed 20 and lastly I tried on printer paper for registration marks. it just scratch the paper.
I am trying on simple vinyl on all forces and all speeds. Nothing helps
Just this shape..I even tried drawing the shape with all individual lines too..no help
Interesting find but the IL file with the curves did not do that for me. Cutting shape from IL-CM-FC9000-160.I imported this file into my corel, and it looks like the 45 cham on the corners are 'curves', whereas the vertical and horizontal lines are 'lines'. (Not sure what distinction illustrator makes between those two.)
At any rate I converted it all to lines in corel and generated this pdf. Try running this shape for kicks.
If this works, I predict the graphtec was reading the ever so slight imperfections between the printer and loading, and it figured it was better to deviate the entire line, seeing as how it was already a curve, as opposed to changing the direction that the plotter needed to travel to hit the next point.
Did you print it or just plot it? My theory hinges on the marks being read.Interesting find but the IL file with the curves did not do that for me. Cutting shape from IL-CM-FC9000-160.
I was talking about Condition 3/3 #4 Blade Adjust.
First I draw the square, drag in with holding down button, making this ocatgon.I imported this file into my corel, and it looks like the 45 cham on the corners are 'curves', whereas the vertical and horizontal lines are 'lines'. (Not sure what distinction illustrator makes between those two.)
At any rate I converted it all to lines in corel and generated this pdf. Try running this shape for kicks.
If this works, I predict the graphtec was reading the ever so slight imperfections between the printer and loading, and it figured it was better to deviate the entire line, seeing as how it was already a curve, as opposed to changing the direction that the plotter needed to travel to hit the next point.
Just plotted it. After see his problem still existed with 16up I didn't figured it had anything to do with reading the marks.Did you print it or just plot it? My theory hinges on the marks being read.
I never did see the ai file get posted, or do you mean you imported the pdf to illustrator?
I think your problem is a mechanical issue with your cutter. Did you do the test I suggested on unprinted vinyl?First I draw the square, drag in with holding down button, making this ocatgon.
Even i try drawing an ocatgon with all sides same
At last I draw all straight lines to make an ocatgon, still it did the same swaying cutting.
if anybody has cm4 and graphtec fc9000 160, try this if works, i tried downloading cm4 over cm5 didnt worked
anybody need AI file, can reach me at gpslitt@gmail.com
Its brand new plotter grpahtec fc9000 160, I bought it last month. And this is my first cutter.I think your problem is a mechanical issue with your cutter. Did you do the test I suggested on unprinted vinyl?
Good point. Mine is about a year old but it does not do that at least not just plotting.Its brand new plotter grpahtec fc9000 160, I bought it last month. And this is my first cutter.
Would have been a mechanical issue, its plotting everything else, perfect,
Even i have files with 3/8" round 100 holes in a 36x36" print
Even I print 3/8"x 1" rectangular 600 cuts per 36" x36" sdheet, all perefect dot
I cut lot of shapes as tiny as 1/4" x 5/8", all other shapes are good, except ocatgon
I was using mimaki cjv150-75 before, never had issue with this shape, just slow
Graphtec support seems helpless too, wrote "For most operators, this would be acceptable, but I understand you are looking for something a little tighter."
regds..
I tried to set blade length with the condition3/3 #4, but not able to set it up. It keep saying 0.1 turn cw and i turn less than 1/2 mm ad it says ccw 0.2.. didnt workedI was talking about Condition 3/3 #4 Blade Adjust.