Welcome To Signs101.com: Largest Forum for Signmaking Professionals

Signs101.com: Largest Forum for Signmaking Professionals is the LARGEST online community & discussion forum for professional sign-makers and graphic designers.

 


  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Hold off on that Vista

Discussion in 'Gerber' started by 2NinerNiner2, Feb 14, 2007.

  1. 2NinerNiner2

    2NinerNiner2 Very Active Member

    1,122
    0
    36
    Mar 21, 2006
    Calgary, AB
    If you have any Gerber hardware and/or software you will want to hold off on that upgrade or new system purchase with Vista installed.

    Ran across this on the ND Graphics web site (after following Fred's link to 'Spandex' in another thread; had no idea ND was part of that company :)

    Here is the link to the 'more info' in the attached image.

    Cheers!
    Lyle
     

    Attached Files:

    Tags:
  2. threeputt

    threeputt Very Active Member

    3,389
    1
    38
    Mar 10, 2006
    washington state
    Thanx 2992, my boy's a software engineer at MicroSoft and was encouraging me just last week to get Vista. And naturally we run Gerber Omega 2.1 on all machines.

    Just emailed him the notice from Gerber to see what he says now. Gerber will probably have a patch for it soon. I hope it doesn't cost a bundle, though.
     
  3. Derf

    Derf Very Active Member

    Got to LOVE good ol' MS.... I'l wait a few years to get vista for our PC
     
  4. Fred Weiss

    Fred Weiss Merchant Member

    20,532
    401
    83
    Sep 11, 2003
    Olympia, WA
    You will need to upgrade your Omega to ver 2.5.x, and then you will receive a free upgrade, when available, to version 2.6 which will be compatible with Vista. Tentative release date for version 2.6 is Spring, 2007.

    This is also an interesting eye-opener about upgrading to Vista.
     
  5. Techman

    Techman Major Contributor

    8,520
    8
    38
    Jun 24, 2003
    michigan
    there are some hidden things going within VISTA.
    One, you will need a bigger (more meomory) better card because VISTA moves all graphics operations away from the main CPU and onto the graphics card.

    NExt. You will need more cpu power to run VISTA because of all the extra protection added in.
    IE: the DMA requirements hog CPU time and memory. For most of us this is hinderance. The program control console is using CPU and memory. This is constantly checking your VISTA machine 30 times a second to make sure you are not running hugh def programming or DVD with unsigned graphics equipment. (license fees to windows). All this is not for your enhancement. IT is to help M$ monopolise the media delivery systems.

    Vista is not some great for the average user. Most of us here will never need it. Sure some like the new interface but that will not be available to the average home user.

    All this over head and equipment requirements and expense is passed along to you as a user. Most of us will not use any of it in the near future. Why? because most of it is not even available yet.

    And then, for those who wish to get bluray or any other high DEF dvd players. Your content images that you pay for will not be delivered to the sreen. The play level wil be highly reduced to that level just above DVD quality.
     
  6. threeputt

    threeputt Very Active Member

    3,389
    1
    38
    Mar 10, 2006
    washington state
    Thanks Techman, for your interesting post. You seem pretty clued in on this technology.
     
  7. Baz

    Baz Very Active Member

  8. Steve C.

    Steve C. Very Active Member

    3,278
    3
    0
    May 22, 2003
    A customer in my shop yesterday told me he just bought a new computer
    with Vista. He was really pi$$ed. Said that about 90% of his programs and
    hardware would not work without tracking down updated versions.
    The longer I us PC and deal with Microsoft, the more I wish I had gone with
    Mac way back when I decided I needed a computer. Do Mac users ever have
    to deal with this kind of nonsence?
     
  9. Fred Weiss

    Fred Weiss Merchant Member

    20,532
    401
    83
    Sep 11, 2003
    Olympia, WA
    Oh yeah. I still remember the nightmare of upgrading from OS 6 to OS 7 on a Mac. I ended up having to lay out over $2K to update all my software. My little iMac still runs OS 9 and I won't go to OS 10 until when and if I ever buy another Mac. It's often easier and cheaper just to replace an entire PC or Mac than to upgrade it ... a fact of life not lost on the hardware and software manufacturers.
     
  10. Steve C.

    Steve C. Very Active Member

    3,278
    3
    0
    May 22, 2003
    Thanks Fred, I feel better now....Those Mac commercials on TV where
    starting to get to me...:biggrin:
     
  11. 2NinerNiner2

    2NinerNiner2 Very Active Member

    1,122
    0
    36
    Mar 21, 2006
    Calgary, AB
    Yeah but Fred...that was back in the late 80s!!! LOL! :) And a lot of the upgrades were to support new processor architectures/manufacturers: Motorola 68K series to PowerPC and now to Intel.
     
  12. gtjet

    gtjet Active Member

    763
    0
    0
    Jun 3, 2005
    Good to know, we where thinking of upgrading, but now I think we will wait.
     
  13. Derf

    Derf Very Active Member

    All I have to say is that moving from OS-9 to OS-X (10) was a total over hall. The good news was that for a few years you could still use OS-9 in "Classic Mode" Worked like crap!

    I felt that OS-X was such an improvement over OS-9 you would have to be an Idiot not to upgrade.

    From OS-X 10.0 - 10.4 upgrades have been awesome with dramatic improvements along the way.

    I can't say the same for Windows 98x or the 2000 disaster, XP was an improvement but still was full of holes IMO

    The MAC OS is just rock solid
     
  14. Rick

    Rick Certified Enneadecagon Designer

    6,955
    389
    83
    Apr 17, 2003
    Valle Vista
    Macs are not immune to this either. I am waiting on Adobe CS3 to get an Intel Mac. The switch to Intel was prbably the best thing Apple could do, but has made it problematic for my current software.
     
  15. Replicator

    Replicator Major Contributor

    10,230
    9
    38
    Nov 19, 2006
    Sun City, AZ
    Recently - within several months, bought 2 new systems - PC [and I don't mean politically correct].

    Made sure they came with XP-media edition . . . and a disc !

    1st thing I did with both systems was wipe them clean of all the CRAP they load on to them . . .

    Re-Formatted the hard-drives and reloaded XP-media edition.

    These systems are blazing fast and as trusted as they've been for the several years that XP has been out

    not that that's syaing much, but we're as happy as clams with our new systems !

    They both came with FREE upgrades to Vista . . . "JUST SAY NO TO VISTA"
     
  16. Derf

    Derf Very Active Member

    I did the same thing with my last PC

    Clean HD fresh install of XP pro 1st edition.
     
  17. Geary

    Geary Very Active Member

    This reminds me a lot of discussions as to the "extra budgeting for computers" back when 2000 and ME came out (horrible operating systems...I mean - DOS manipulation! :tongue: ).

    I used to cry "planned obsolescence" for it....but now I personally just feel it's merely the way of technological evolution. Knowledge is increasing daily. :wink:

    ~Gear
     
Loading...

Share This Page

 


Loading...