1st. The majority of income inequality is the divide between the super-rich and everyone else.
2nd. Do you know how most people become super-rich? First, you work your *** off to become rich &
instead of taking it easy, fishing, golfing & spending time with the family, you continue to be a workaholic
until you're old & the only thing you have to show for it is a number on a page.
Would you do that? I know I wouldn't... how much they have has zero bearing on anyone else.
The only issue worth discussing is the quality of life for poor and working class.
Yes, there is room for improvement, no doubt about that, but America's poor have a better quality of life than the majority of the world's "middle class".
1. Death by starvation simply does not happen in America.
2. We have some of the strongest work safety laws in place to protect the poor while they struggle to better themselves.
3. There is a multitude of avenues the poor can take to better themselves, from scholarships to college and trade schools, to the military, etc.
The struggle is a gift, it makes us stronger, better people and adds meaning to our lives.
I think we all know rich brats that have never had to struggle & become useless, cr@ppy people.
The same can be said of life-long welfare recipients that never have had to make their own way.
To your first point and the $64,000 question that myself, rossmosh, BobbyH, equippaint and a few have tried to answer. Whether the divide is limited to just the super rich and the rest of us or not, WHEN does it become large enough to cause destabilization in a society and create such problems that things like suicides, drug and alcohol abuse, violence, targeting and blaming of "others" resulting in increased hate and bias crimes, family instability, etc.?
2nd point. The truly super rich get that way MOSTLY through inherited wealth, hard work, some luck and the efforts and hard labor of lots of people helping turn THEIR idea, widget, service, etc. into a success. Take a 25 truck plumbing company for example. Very common size company in bigger cities. At $125.00 per hour per truck and 6-7 billable hours per day. In a 250 day work year, that's almost $5,000,000 per year in revenue. Not super rich for the owner, but definitely in the top 1%. The owner didn't invent plumbing repair and may have inherited the company from his dad or grandfather, and while he may have worked his tail off to grow, it's undeniable that he could not have grown from a 1 person company to 25 without the efforts and hard work of his employees. That example can be duplicated across the board for most circumstances.
I find the next set of thoughts to be highly provincial, a little naive and lacking in exposure to just how bad millions of others living in the wealthiest country in world history have it. I've traveled the back roads, back country, wild places of this country for years including a 35,000 mile, 18 month sojourn between early 2003 to mid 2004. I'm sure most of the deeply entrenched "poor" in America would love to trade places with the "middle classes" in every comparably industrialized, democratically represented country but somehow I think you didn't mean to include all those countries, only the third world/poor countries.
As Americans we seem to ignore the fact that there are equally or better developed countries than ours with plenty of well compensated, happier, healthier people living wonderful lives that include plenty of nice things, far more leisure time than us and a social safety net that catches them when they fall or stumble. Corporations and business leaders in those kinds of advanced societies accept and embrace the FACTS about the importance of social responsibility being key to stability and social well being.
Just because you don't see commercials for hunger relief agencies seeking contributions to fight deep seated hunger in America doesn't mean it doesn't exist. I know several big city ER nurses and I spent some time between jobs training to be a 911 Dispatcher. My friends have related hunger related deaths and I personally took multiple calls about deaths in homeless encampments related to malnourishment. I'm sure the moralists here will blame it on substance abuse, but that's another story.
These worker safety laws you think are aiding the lower classes work in industrial safety and bliss as they ascend the ladder to prosperity are under constant assault and the agencies tasked with enforcement are hamstrung by limited budgets and minimal oversight. You want to talk about worker safety, we can't even keep our food supply, money and medicines from making people sick because industry resists any oversight and opportunistic politicians slam regulations meant to protect consumers as excessive.
These awful welfare sponges have been subject to 60 month limits to federal welfare programs since the late 90's. Most state are even less generous. Corporate welfare recipients don't seem to have the same limitations as the costs to the Treasury they exact are easily triple or quadruple what social welfare costs. The poor may get scholarships to college if they are able to weave their way through the mountains of paperwork involved, but they usually can't afford to live or eat while attending, so they end up working while at school and struggle.
I'm still waiting for a moral argument FOR unbridled wealth accumulation beyond any reasonable person's wildest imagination even when you have millions and millions of people without basic necessities. I'd love to see a defense of why Flint, MI not still doesn't have drinkable water and how those salt of the earth, hard working former auto workers should suffer while the GM executives who live in high end homes and enjoy the fruits of every one of those worker's labors shouldn't share in the solution somehow.
Income and wealth inequality isn't just monetary. Its living in Chemical Alley near Baton Rouge, or on a native american reservation near a defunct uranium mine leaching toxins into the water table. Or the poor people of Liberty Town in Miami who are being forced out ot make way for gentrification because that neighborhood is on higher ground and isn't subject to DAILY flooding like other parts of the city are.