• I want to thank all the members that have upgraded your accounts. I truly appreciate your support of the site monetarily. Supporting the site keeps this site up and running as a lot of work daily goes on behind the scenes. Click to Support Signs101 ...

KR3 Banned for Life ? ? ?

KR3 Banned for Life ? ? ?


  • Total voters
    76
  • Poll closed .
I can't stand the guy or his posts but if we are going to start banning ppl for posting worthless content I vote we put Ken at the top of that list.

I did see the image that the dipstick in question posted and it was a MAN giving a BJ to a he/she...regardless it has no business on this site.
 

Jackpine

New Member
His posts are totally out of line here. I come here to learn and share about this trade. I really pass over his post since there is very little positive and very seldom anything that makes sense or is helpful in them. Ban for life???? I just ignore the ignorance. It may be different if one didn't know any better but I believe he does.
 

skyhigh

New Member
Rep...do you remember when someone wrote this about you and a picture you posted?

Don't tell me....is that suggesting what I think it's suggesting? OMG, what a perv!!!

That one post in the "shagnasty" thread has always made me apprehensive of you. Now your the one casting stones....kinda ironic.

(the picture has since been removed)

As for kr3, he is on my ignore list. No time for all that dribble.
 

THATgirl

New Member
I don't really think signs101 needs to have nude pics posted, but I don't think we need to see camel toes and turds either. With so many different personalities you are certain to dislike or like those who post so many times a day. I am sure it gets on Fred's nerves. Most of us are lucky we can just skim over the posts from those who have nothing better to do than post a zillion times a day.
 

Craig Sjoquist

New Member
freedom of speech ....

not seen kr3 posts that your reffering to but ..how many of YOU .. have been out of line .. if thats the case

besides he does a great job with advertising..very knowledgable with what he does best ..wraps

want some cheese with that wine

fonts have rights
 

Replicator

New Member
Rep...do you remember when someone wrote this about you and a picture you posted?

Don't tell me....is that suggesting what I think it's suggesting? OMG, what a perv!!!

That one post in the "shagnasty" thread has always made me apprehensive of you. Now your the one casting stones....kinda ironic.

I do remember that Sky, and it wasn't representing anything of the sort, but I
can see how some may have been offended . . .

I have tried to grow on this site, and become a tempered, stable,
yet fun and contributing member here on 101,
and I am not ashamed of any posts I have made . . . Ever . . . !
 

skyhigh

New Member
ya know Rep, I tried for the longest time to understand what kinda "funny" you were trying to make....thinking surely I must not be getting the joke, unfortunately you never came forth with an explanation.
 

Replicator

New Member
ya know Rep, I tried for the longest time to understand what kinda "funny" you were trying to make....thinking surely I must not be getting the joke, unfortunately you never came forth with an explanation.

It was a road kill thing my friend . . . and it was a babies doll . . . !

Poor taste, YES !

Pornographic, NO !
 

Tiki

Font Sage
Well i seen the pics when he posted it. looks like he Hotlinked the pic from a certain website at first it was the image of the (drunkin santa)
looks like they added a code to stop bandwith theft and changed the code to have the porn pic
(Pic+Im a dirty Badwdith thief)when hotlinked

Sometimes being a jokester sometimes backfires :Oops:
 
S

SignTech

Guest
i havent been here long or contributed much expert advice , think i helped one guy fix his cutter...defintly not here to see porn. but in my world a woman performing Fellatio is not a bad thing.or perverted or whatever you wanna call it. so im gonna vote no.

It appears the topic is regarding banning someone on S101 ... not any of OUR worlds. Although I agree with your highlighted sentence above, there is a place for everything ... and s101 is not the place IMO. I am hard rock musician who did some wild things in my life and still do. But not on s101.

This isn't about your world or anyones else's private world on s101. S101 is a community ... and has set rules and regulations just like any other community. And we as a whole should abide by them.

That said .......... true porn does not belong here ... an occasional bikini shot of a sexy guy or girl picture ... in taste ... in a general forum does not constitute porn .......... I didn't see the post but I trust it was in bad taste for 2 reasons.

1 - I am very familiar with K3's posts ... they are usually not in good taste and sometimes downright rude and his dialog is almost non existent with regards to helping other s101 members.

2 - If Fred removed it is was for good reason, he tolerates more than I would expect.

Finally ... it is not my position to decide what Fred does ... this s101 does need more moderators at times. An apology with recognition of K3's post would be expected at the least and better policing of ourselves would help.

This is a forum for men and women and we need to respect each others boundaries. 20 years in the Fire Department we where wild and had bad mouths ... but when a woman or children walked in it was a different game ... s101 is our house (in a way) we have to police it like we do our own house ... I'm a guy and I do not want to see X level pictures on s101 even though I am in favor of our right to view porn. In private. If this was a mistake as one person suggests the Fred will sort it out.

~M
 

iSign

New Member
freedom of speech ....

not seen kr3 posts that your reffering to but ..how many of YOU .. have been out of line .. if thats the case

besides he does a great job with advertising..very knowledgable with what he does best ..wraps

want some cheese with that wine

fonts have rights

Craig, you are thinking of K6Media... he is the helpful knowledgable, wrap master K-number guy you're thinking of... but this thread is about KR3... different guy.


Well i seen the pics when he posted it. looks like he Hotlinked the pic from a certain website at first it was the image of the (drunkin santa)
looks like they added a code to stop bandwith theft and changed the code to have the porn pic
(Pic+Im a dirty Badwdith thief)when hotlinked

Sometimes being a jokester sometimes backfires :Oops:

VERY INTERESTING POINT TIKI!
Now I feel bad for the guy, I did a little google searching & found several discussions about writing code to sort of "time release" pornographic images in place of an innocent image that happened to be hotlinked. If this is what Tiki saw... we are ALL upset over something that was unintentional.

Let me be the first to apologize to KR3!
(I still think your pic posting was somewhat excessive... but so is my opinionated posting)
 

GregT

New Member
I choose to ignore KR3 and his posts. Problem is that I don't need to see those pictures on my computer where a customer may/or may not see.

Banning for life is tough, sometimes "tough love" is a good thing
 

cOrKinSA

New Member
VERY INTERESTING POINT TIKI!
Now I feel bad for the guy, I did a little google searching & found several discussions about writing code to sort of "time release" pornographic images in place of an innocent image that happened to be hotlinked. If this is what Tiki saw... we are ALL upset over something that was unintentional.

Let me be the first to apologize to KR3!
(I still think your pic posting was somewhat excessive... but so is my opinionated posting)
I second that.
I was typing something about christmas tress, lights or something pertaining to it and saw a very bad image that didn't fit the discription. The only way I knew it was changed was because people were posting positive about it when it clearly was anything but. It frightens me to think if any of my post were changed like that. From now on I am going to download them to my photobucket and attach it from there.
IF this was the case I apologize to you KR3.
 

Fred Weiss

Merchant Member
I second that.
I was typing something about christmas tress, lights or something pertaining to it and saw a very bad image that didn't fit the discription. The only way I knew it was changed was because people were posting positive about it when it clearly was anything but. It frightens me to think if any of my post were changed like that. From now on I am going to download them to my photobucket and attach it from there.
IF this was the case I apologize to you KR3.

First off, I have heard from KR3SignGuy regarding this and he claims to have been a victim. My thoughts on this are that they are quite likely true but I am still going to leave the one week suspension in place because I don't agree with the practice of linking to other sites for image content.

As far as PhotoBucket type sites, I do not want such sites used for image display here at Signs 101. This site give you two very good ways to upload your images directly to here which I want all image uploaders to use from this point forward. They are
  • Attachment directly to the thread or
  • Uploading to the photo gallery and then using the uploaded image for image placement in your post.
The reasons for this are:
  • Having images on site reduces the risk of photos disappearing at a later time.
  • Having images on site eliminates the expansion of forum templates when an oversized picture is posted.
  • Having images on site is authorized and is, therefore, not stealing anyone's bandwidth.
  • Having images on site will eliminate any possibility of anyone switching a photo from the original to something objectionable.
So that's the rules from this point forward on posting pics. If the image is not on site then the post will be deleted.
 

SignManiac

New Member
I personally am far more offended by certain self proclaimed religious fanatics who insists on pushing their beliefs on this forum than a few risque photos.

However I do enjoy Bob from Earth's take on life and view points so it all equals out in the end.
 

3mpainter

New Member
i find it kinda odd that the guy who started the sexy pic post, and has an avitar that references the hell raiser movie which is a sado-masochistic movie is the one who is calling for someone to be banned.
 

Bradster941

New Member
.

As far as PhotoBucket type sites, I do not want such sites used for image display here at Signs 101. This site give you two very good ways to upload your images directly to here which I want all image uploaders to use from this point forward. They are
  • Attachment directly to the thread or
  • Uploading to the photo gallery and then using the uploaded image for image placement in your post.
The reasons for this are:
  • Having images on site reduces the risk of photos disappearing at a later time.
  • Having images on site eliminates the expansion of forum templates when an over-sized picture is posted.
  • Having images on site is authorized and is, therefore, not stealing anyone's bandwidth.
  • Having images on site will eliminate any possibility of anyone switching a photo from the original to something objectionable.
So that's the rules from this point forward on posting pics. If the image is not on site then the post will be deleted.



OK, that makes since, but was wondering if someone could post a step by step tutorial on how to do option #2

Uploading to the photo gallery and then using the uploaded image for image placement in your post.


? once uploaded to the gallery, do you copy the URL address, then use that yellow icon that looks like there is a mountain in it, (insert image), or something else?

? on the gallery page, it says file size is unlimited, but don't I need to keep those file sizes under a certain size so when inserted into a post it doesn't "Wack It" into a Giant off the screen size?


I would much rather have a full size picture rather than a thumb nail that people have to do the extra step of clicking on, and then waiting for a new window to open up. I just need someone to tell me how to do it so, if you have a moment, please type away.

Thanks,

Bradster.



.
 

cOrKinSA

New Member
i find it kinda odd that the guy who started the sexy pic post, and has an avitar that references the hell raiser movie which is a sado-masochistic movie is the one who is calling for someone to be banned.
It's a fine line 3M, you can't compare Pinhead or a woman in a sexy santa suit to a full out sex act. That's where rules come to play.
 

gvgraphics

New Member
I would much rather have a full size picture rather than a thumb nail that people have to do the extra step of clicking on, and then waiting for a new window to open up. I just need someone to tell me how to do it so, if you have a moment, please type away.

Most would rather have a thumb nail image. The main thread will open faster and run better. Plus then there is no chance of the screen widening due to an over sized image. I don't mind clicking the thumb nail, it takes all of 2 seconds to load. Then I can view the image if I want to only.
 
Top