• I want to thank all the members that have upgraded your accounts. I truly appreciate your support of the site monetarily. Supporting the site keeps this site up and running as a lot of work daily goes on behind the scenes. Click to Support Signs101 ...

Not a sign sign, but a sign of the future!

signswi

New Member
I'm generally in favor of robots and aerial drones but the fact that domestic police forces are using drones now to track protesters and such is a bit over the line in my book. What are you going to do. Hello Skynet!
 

TyrantDesigner

Art! Hot and fresh.
For the love of all that is unholy ... can you imagine the implication of formation flight if you are able to flood an area with hundreds that can chain detonate a phospherous explosive in each one ... good lord ... scary stuff.
 

Pat Whatley

New Member
Interesting that all anybody can think to use this for is weapons.

I'm envisioning a robotic house painting and skyscraper window cleaning systems.
 

ProWraps

New Member
yeah those little guys are cool and all, but rip a massive **** anywhere near them and they will loose formation and flight characteristics QUICK.


wind is a mother to small aerial vehicles. no way these would work outside a lab.

edit: this site just **** out F A R T

good god.
 

Locals Find!

New Member
For the love of all that is unholy ... can you imagine the implication of formation flight if you are able to flood an area with hundreds that can chain detonate a phospherous explosive in each one ... good lord ... scary stuff.

I was thinking what about using them as deployable mines? Imagine a special forces team making an entrance or exit having those programmed to land behind them as they move to protect their egress route. While having the ability to recall and reposition them at will. Or even use them to clear rooms that might have wires, motions sensors etc.. better to lose a $50 helicopter than a human life.
 

genericname

New Member
I was thinking what about using them as deployable mines? Imagine a special forces team making an entrance or exit having those programmed to land behind them as they move to protect their egress route. While having the ability to recall and reposition them at will. Or even use them to clear rooms that might have wires, motions sensors etc.. better to lose a $50 helicopter than a human life.

The weaponization of these things bothers me to no end. I have no problem with the military using them as a life-saving measure, like when their use in a mission would mean fewer lives lost in the end, but so far these technologies have largely removed the human element, and turn killing into a game.

That being said, some of the proposed military uses are awesome, like using them as small wireless internet routers, constructing a hard to destroy network based communications system. That could be used both by the military's intelligence teams, or by civilians in situations where their local governments have shut down communications.
 

signswi

New Member
I was thinking what about using them as deployable mines? Imagine a special forces team making an entrance or exit having those programmed to land behind them as they move to protect their egress route. While having the ability to recall and reposition them at will. Or even use them to clear rooms that might have wires, motions sensors etc.. better to lose a $50 helicopter than a human life.

$50? You know even if $50 is the cost per the military is going to buy them at $25,000 per contracted for delivery of 18 million units over five years or something absurd ;P.

I'm with genericname.
 
Top