For me, the only thing balanced between the two is my dislike for each. I simply refuse to accept the premise that a choice in our vote should be for whom we think is the lesser of two evils. A vote for Gary Johnson may not put him in the White House but it will, quite possibly, have some positive effect on the mind set and conduct of our next president ... perhaps even contribute to third party viability and positive change in Washington in the future.
This is very wishful thinking, regardless of who it is supposed to wake up and create a new mindset. It happened with her husband in 1992 with Ross Perot. That is one of the biggest things she is hoping for, that Republicans being conscientious voters will stray from a somewhat wildman and go for the weaker candidate, thus splitting up the votes among Republicans, while her base will not budge. This is fact, not prejudice or anything else. No stereotyping or anything else. I could care less if the Republican party fails or the Democrats fail, but to see another 4 years of the exact same thing in charge is just ridiculous. And that's all she is.... a continuance of the failed policies and growth we've witnessed under the present guy in there. Perhaps a pure novice in charge of the country would be a good thing, but why someone so naive ?? I would like to see this country run with precision and knowledge for a future for all of our grandchildrens and their children.
The debates last night did nothing for either of them, but to make him look like a babbling fool and her a smug lying cheat. He had facts, but she ignored them. She had excuses and well-rehearsed come-backs. At one point she had the same twisted smile on her face, that Obama sports around with. I know they can't help how they look, but why is it alright for her and not Trump ??