I voted "it's fine the way it is". I won't personally mention or ask for prices in an open forum because I don't want to risk any of my customers (however unlikely that may be)seeing that information. What others choose to do is up to them. I do wish the wholesale prices were kept in a premium or "trade only" forum.
I'm sorry but did I read you correctly? You vote one way, but believe another? WTF??? :ROFLMAO:
My vote (my compromise) is "More Restrictive". Buy a CM and talk price all you want.
I don't think that signmeup is that far off base. I tend to share the same view. I won't discuss pricing in the open forums. I won't show customer art there, either. However, I still think it's rather Draconian to try and restrict free enterprise in the forum as it is now.
Personally, I don't think it's anyone's business to tell me who and where I spend my money. It's my same feeling that an MM doesn't need to be told how to market their product. While I'm tickled that certain advertisers are no longer with us, they could have just as easily been placed in my ignore list. Both vendors, that I am aware of getting the boot, showed poor form and little respect for Signs 101 members.
Still, I wouldn't know how to draw any sort of formal line on behavior or develop a concrete policy against the spammish posts. Then too, I see it as an administrative nightmare.
Aside from a member's reaction on posts, strict policy directives can be counter productive to building Signs 101 as a knowledge base. But, that's the fundamental beauty of Signs 101. It's guided by a benevolent king who shows great repect for the forum as a member driven community.
Heck, based on the cost, IMO, a rotating banner ad with a logo and tagline is still a great value for a vendor. If the advertiser is aware of the "rules" at the front end, they could be a great partner for the Forum.
I can envision a PDF download of advertising guidelines for prospective merchants... with the "rules of engagement." But who's going to draft it? We know Fred's position. Still, I'd bet he'd be gracious enough to review a proposal. I'd guess it'd have to be fair to all members with a effective plan of implementation.
skyhigh? isag? replicator?... by appearances, you three seem to be the most vocal proponents of a restrictive policy. Are you interested? There's poll results that support your opinion. There's discussion that supports your opinion. Heck, write it, see what happens.