I've silently watched this thread to see if it was actually anything more than the website's self-appointed thread cop projecting his own perceptions of the site's participants in the form of a biased and quite suggestively leading "poll" or if it was a sincere effort at getting a pulse of the site.
Given the last few responses to Fred by the OP and especially responses #13 and 18, I'd have to say my conclusion is that it is the former not the latter.
Because of the tenuous and usually contentious nature of the relationship between the OP and myself, I've avoided weighing in directly to him on most topics he participates in for some time now, but because he's asking for people's opinions, I feel entitled to offer mine. I'm already girding for the expectant attack either here in public or via PM as he has done on more than on one occasion. I would warn anyone here who advocates for freedom of speech to be very fearful of a person who wants to intimidate others who might even just click the "dislike post" button
The mere premise that a site with thousands of members all over the world ranging from the quietly observing to the multitudes of posts per day contributors would all fit into a neatly, predictable sum total of opinion is ridiculous on its face.
The next statement is partially in caps for emphasis because it answers most of the "poll" questions in one shot and lays out my motivations for coming here regularly.
I SPECIFICALLY come here for the DIVERSITY of OPINIONS, the sometimes BRUTAL HONESTY, VARYING SKILL LEVELS of participants, unique POSTING STYLES, light, dark and sometimes crude HUMOR, OFFBEAT personalities, the FREEDOM within certain limits to speak openly and occasionally off topic if the thread's energy goes that direction, the PROMPT and mostly ON TOPIC and HIGHLY USEFUL answers to questions, etc. Above all, I enjoy the camaraderie and mutual respect most of us share with each other and enjoy offering any kernel of real life knowledge, experiences and conversational chat to the mix. This is after all a "chat" room.
What I DON'T come here for is to feel forced into adhering to only one domineering particpant's vision of what a site he didn't build or pay for. I think when things get so confining and forced through such a narrow funnel, they tend to go stale and people lose interest.
Despite most respondents taking the time to answer the questions sincerely, I got the impression after #13 and 18 that the OP wasn't all that happy that folks actually just answered and didn't roil the pot to help him confirm what is pretty obviously an attempt to create a self-fulfilling prophecy.