I got nothin' on WFI, FMF and WTF. Sample is a little rough, but the bones are there.
Colin, your samples always appear to be something poorly traced from a bitmap.
Your posts for font I.D. are running about 2% return.
Note: "The definition of Insanity, is doing the same thing over and over again while expecting different results at some point".
Not always, just sometimes, when I deem it a better way to display the original sample.
Could that be because I've already run them through a rather vigorous ID process, and they are not actually fonts at all?
The insanity charge is a tad brash I'd say.
Doesn't look like a fuzzy jpeg because there are differences. The jpeg has straighter parts that aren't there in the original picture. Not that it helps, because I have absolutely no idea what the font is, but it definitely looks like a font.That's real funny Colin ... a fuzzy jpeg of your traced image.
That's real funny Colin ... a fuzzy jpeg of your traced image.
Thank you. As someone who answers a lot of these requests, posting the original sample is 1000x better than posting your attempt at "enhancing" the image by autotracing or whatever you did to it.Here ya go....
Sorry, yet another false claim. This is what I had to work with.
Why are you so bitter and argumentative on this? This is just a simple ID request. I've given you what you demanded, and you still aren't happy. Geesh.
While I wholeheartedly agree with S'Rex's early assessments..... did anyone ever identify this font ??
Yes folks, Gino (the forum's perennial, abrasive jackass) is not attempting a jab here, he's genuinely interested in what font this is.
How transparently pathetic.
Yes folks, Gino (the forum's perennial, abrasive jackass) is not attempting a jab here, he's genuinely interested in what font this is.
How transparently pathetic.
I could care less about the font's name, I want to know the name of the meds SignosaurusRex has been taking, or is that to transparently pathetic.