Joe Diaz
New Member
Earth has nothing to do with it, when you want to find silly loopholes to make the other look bad, you start using emotional stunts. You would've been better off saying Joe to Gino, cause I wasn't talking about Earth in any regards. I realize the lady isn't his customer, but she did threaten him and in the filed he makes his living. She threatened his reputation and workmanship. That constitutes a confrontation. Understand this Joe, confrontation does not mean you have to butt heads and have a cat fight with the lady. It can also mean meeting of persons face to face, an open conflict of opposing ideas, forces, etc. or a bringing together of ideas, themes, etc., for comparison. It's you who is being narrow minded about words, now. Also, another area you are falling short on is defending one's self or accusing another in court, no matter what level of a court you are in. As you must've forgotten already, I said I would/will take a deadbeat to court in a New York second for various reasons, but getting the second half of payment for whatever reason they concocted not to pay is the main one. When they deny things in court, you are required to defend yourself against their accusations.
Oh I'm sorry I thought this was a conversation about the topic at hand not everything else that is rattling around in your head. And you started all the personal crap. I simply started the thread out stating that I disagree with those who suggested he sat down with her and possibly make a deal with her. I'm sorry that seems to upset you so much. But it's what I believe and what OUR experience has shown us. You came back with the "you are not thinking clearly" "stoopid" "deadbeat" comments. Not me. I don't have to make you "look bad" You are doing a fine job of that on your own. I think it's odd that you seem to think everyone is trying to do that to you all the time. I simply said I disagree, then defended my position and tried my hardest to stay on topic. Speaking of on topic, If people have this much trouble agreeing on things like this on this forum, imagine trying to come to an agreement with this lady, who I hope we can all agree is being unreasonable. (Can we at least agree on that?) That's the main reason why I disagree with the idea of trying to reason with her. There is a high chance that it won't go anywhere, or even make things worst.
First of all no one is arguing about having your ducks in a row, and in this case it seems as though he does. Even if he didn't have a before photo at first he does now. That being said it certainly doesn't mean he needs to meet with her and compare notes. In fact an attorney would recommend not to if a lawsuit or the threat of one is involved. If this were something to worry about, which based on what 401 has posted, it doesn't seem like it is, I would recommend having a lawyer contact her or her lawyer if a lawsuit is on the table. Either way, If she takes him to court, she takes him to court, he has evidence proving his point, and no one is arguing that he shouldn't get paperwork and other evidence together.Joe, you stated your parents business has gone to court for bad pay from a customer. Same here. However, they usually have some stoopid story as to why they shouldn't have to pay and that's where the paper trail, before and after pictures and an outlined written letter explaining the entire episode will help you win your case and needing a lawyer for that is generally a gross waste of money. The only reason one needs attorneys are when you don't know how to handle or conduct yourself in a court of law, or you feel the outcome needs help from your end.
I said, in this case, based on what 401 has stated, she has no case against him, so it is highly unlikely that anything will result from it, again, based on what 401 has stated. It's not hiding, to ignore her. What it actual is is not giving her threats credibility, Taking him to court is going to cost her because she is wrong, so she probably wont, and if she was crazy enough to sue him anyway, sitting down to talk about it wouldn't accomplish anything, in fact it might make this clearly unreasonable person even more angry when she finds out she can't get her way.If you think what I suggested is wrong, that's your prerogative. However, to tell others what I'm saying is wrong and it's better to hide behind apron strings or just ignore a problem, that's not only childish, it's outright foolish. Also, if someone threatened to sue you and you don't discuss it first with them, why are you still gonna just ignore them ?? If this method has been working for you as you proclaimed, then I must presume you are used to ignoring threats of being sued and non-payment and just hoped for the best. Perhaps this is why this comes quickly to mind for you ?? Kinda like at church where after offering, the usher throws all the money in the offering plate up in the air and whatever God catches is His and whatever falls on the floor is the ushers, huh ??
Again, there is no contract with this person. Are you actually reading this thread?If you noticed, I said I have another lawyer for personal. In civil matters and other incidents..... THEN an attorney is 100% necessary, but not in black & white contracts between two little companies.