Although SSD's excel in just about every aspect when compared to HHD's, I believe the longevity of SSD to be considerably less than that of HDD when used for storage of data that is written and overwritten a lot. In other words, what Wild West said is certainly worth consideration.
My computer has three drives, all SSD. The drive that my operating system and software runs off of (Samsung) has been working for over 5 years now with not one problem. My backup drive (Western Digital) has also been a solid performer for the last five years. However, the drive that I store my files on over the years and write a ton of data to hasn't faired as well. I just had it replaced for the second time in five years.
I ran a Samsung for almost four years with no problems. Then late last year I had to replace it. We went with SanDisk. Boy was that a mistake. The first drive we put in didn't even function correctly out of the box, so a second SanDisk drive was put in and the first was returned for a refund. The 'good' SanDisk drive didn't even make it 11 months before crashing a few weeks ago. This time we put in a Patriot drive to see if it performs any better as they were recommended by our tech. If this drive lasts for a shorter term than expected I may be going back to HDD for my file storage but I'll continue to use SSD for my OS and software because they are just insanely fast. My computer can do a full reboot in about 30 seconds and programs open up much faster with SSD.
If I could recommend any one brand of SSD, I'd say go with Samsung. I took a chance on a Patriot this time around because my computer tech loves them but I know from experience Samsung drives are consistent performers. Do not buy SanDisk as I believe you will be disappointed in the long run.