Wait a second, so it's Adobe's fault that Apple can't seem to figure out an effective way to integrate flash into it's products, when thousands of other hardware companies develop devices that can view flash?
Yes, that's what I'm saying Joe. Apple told them what needed to be done to run on their platform and they decided not to do it. Apple makes hardware. Without hardware, software is useless. If a hardware manufacturer says this is what we need from you, and you don't deliver it or work with them, then that's your fault.
Adobe can fix this to run under Apple's guidelines, but they won't. So what's going to happen? No Flash for iphones, or ipads, and we'll see HTML5 and H.264 get bigger and bigger. So who lost? Apple? I don't think so. I think Adobe is the one that will lose in this.
Just my opinion, I'm nobody special.
Oh, this just in from Microsoft :
The future of the web is HTML5. Microsoft is deeply engaged in the HTML5 process with the W3C. HTML5 will be very important in advancing rich, interactive web applications and site design. The HTML5 specification describes video support without specifying a particular video format. We think H.264 is an excellent format. In its HTML5 support, IE9 will support playback of H.264 video only.
So it's Apple and Microsoft not supporting flash as the playback method for video. So now all that think it's all Apple and their arrogance can expand that to include Microsoft as well