Search results

More better. You might want to reduce the fretwork even more or at least bring it closer in to, perhaps even somewhat behind, the copy. There seems to be too much air between the decorations and the text.

I'm not sure what's available there on the emerald isle but any decent drywall supply house will have rules up to to 10 feet long. In one or two foot increments. While there you can also pick up a 4 foot or even larger aluminum T-square. I have aluminum rules in 4 and 6 feet and one day...

The Sarah Script is discordant with whatever it is you used for the main copy as is the bilious green 1950's flavor tilted triangle. But the biggest thing wrong with it is that it's functionally illegible. All of those gratuitous devices you've strung about are supposed to frame and accent the...

If you're referring to the automatic marks placed on the output by Flexi you have no control over them. If they're not printing sufficiently dark to be detected you have other problems. Either your printer and/or the profile you're using has an issue with black or your plotter's mark...

Most any blueprint shop can deal with large format scanning. Generally for a pittance.

Far better to get a bumper sticker in lieu of a tattoo. Then, when you no longer feel as you do [and that day will come], you can scrape it off your bumper.

Looks like something produced by a representative of the typographically challenged working at full capacity, perhaps for inclusion in some high school newsletter. It has no redeeming value whatsoever.

Close but no cigar. Everything you said up to the 3 in 1 oil is gospel. But do not ever, as in ever, lubricate the up/down mechanism. If you do all you'll accomplish is to make a first class dust catcher out of it. I'm not certain but the actual mechanism is more likely a variety of voice...

It looks very much like a god-awful thing called 'Rough Rider Redux' with the 'R' diddled a bit. Or not...

At first glance your alternative reads 'Bun Bows Boutique' in that cartoon type face. The 'i' and 'm' in 'Bim' take on a configuration pretty much indistinguishable from the 'u's in 'Boutique'. If this this is supposed to be legible to normal vanilla earth people, lose the balloonesque type and...

I never said force together, I said under tension. Big difference. And unless you bring the pieces together under a bit of tension, as in 'tight', there will always be movement. Always. We're building houses here out of dubious materials, not furniture out of perfectly dried and seasoned wood...

Not quite true. Mosh has put his finger on the major porblem with nail guns. When you build, say, a wall, the finished product will better stay together and stay straight and plumb if all of the components are under a bit of tension**. If the pieces are all simply floating in place then...

There's no copyright on the sort of stuff you're talking about, there never was. I print my share of Rembrandts, Manets, Millets, etc. on canvas. You can make all the copies you want, you can incorporate the images into other works, you can do just about anything you want with them. But what...

I think that an entirely new model needs to be developed wherein the concept of 'intellectual property' must be redefined. It's unclear the the traditional concept of 'intellectual property' is realistically enforceable give technology that's ubiquitous. There is no distinction between innocent...

One can only wonder what that sentence might have said had it been written by a sentient being.

Did it ever occur to you that I might feel as I do because I do understand not because I don't?

Your point being? The author was paid for the work. The the publisher makes or does not make a fortune should concern the author in what way? The publisher took the risk, the publisher reaps such rewards as he can. Again, the point is...? Did you pay money for the book? If so then it's your...

It's unclear that licensing is not merely an extension of the basic silliness. If someone pays someone else to paint a picture, write a song, code a program, why isn't that the end of it? The person that did the work was paid for its work, why should it be any concern to the originator if the...

I'm not sure. On one hand it doesn't seem like 'intellectual property' the kind of thing that lends itself to a traditional concept of 'ownership' without a foray into 'thought crime'. On the other hand, people should be able to profit from their work. But should they profit from selling it or...

Sadly the whole body of law dealing with copyright and attendant issues is hopelessly chained to another era. An era when the means of reproduction were not virtually universal and laws, even then silly, could at least be enforced. Time marches on and the entire concept of 'intellectual...