whatsinaname
New Member
Can any desktop sized pigment based ink printer printers like Epson SC-P407 print on printable Vinyls like IJ-180c etc? Or do we need a special ink to print on such vinyl? Which printer do you use for designing your prints?
and media with special coatings is much more expensiveWaterbased pigmented ink used in desktop printers are needing special coatings on media like vinyl. For printing on IJ180, you need a printer with solvent-, latex-, resin- or UV-Inks.
for years, many did.Dekstop printer ink will also fade very badly in quite a short time. You couldn't sell customers work done with a desktop printer.
Depending on display conditions, and assuming protective topcoats are used- this may not be true for desktop and/or wide-format aqueous inkjet pigment ink.Dekstop printer ink will also fade very badly in quite a short time. You couldn't sell customers work done with a desktop printer.
Depends where it is, that 7-9 year number is only the ever shrinking amount of time that 3M will stand behind their product...it doesn't really have much to do with how it actually lasts in the field. 180c may start to fade and deteriorate after 7-9 years of full constant sun/road wear but solvent printed 180c will last much longer than 7-9 years in most cases. It doesn't just fall apart with age if not being acted upon by outside forces....the laminate 3M suggest for this 7-9 year vinyl is now only rated for 3-5 years ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. We still see it last 10-15+ years outdoor if properly installed on horizontal surface.If you are using pigments, they should be somewhat archival. Water soluble dyes would have faded fast... but Epson Ultrachrome inks, or HP, or Canon pigments are pretty stable. There are aqueous coated vinyls but not many choices... keep in mind vinyl is NOT a long term substrate. 7-9 years is the longest lasting cast vinyl and inevitably, it will start to deteriorate.
Possibly if only used indoors and never in any direct sunlight, but certainly not for outdoor / vehicle use etc... Topcoats can help, but they aren't really a proper way of doing it compared to printing with non water based inks and you don't have any real guarantee of how long it is going to protect them.Depending on display conditions, and assuming protective topcoats are used- this may not be true for desktop and/or wide-format aqueous inkjet pigment ink.
If you are using it for that, do the design yourself and just get a local print shop using solvent printers to print them out for you. Would be cheaper and you would know exactly what you are getting without having to adjust colours from the sample.Forgot to mention that we need this printer just for designing our samples. I mean I know this output will not be the same as the eco-solvent printers but this could be somewhat close to how we want it in the Eco-solvent printers.
So the process would be like designing our artworks using this sampling printer, finalizing the designs and then again taking 1-2 prints in the actual eco-solvent or UV printer to get the color profiles perfect.
We will be using them for decals and stickers for mobile devices. And we definitely would be using a laminate over it. So if the printer is good enough we can do some short production runs if possible. Otherwise we will use it just for the design and sampling.
Really?You will never get the same density or vibrancy of colour from water based
so you are leaning towards inferior quality, faster fading and approx 8 times the cost per sq. ft for your substrates?If you are using pigments, they should be somewhat archival. Water soluble dyes would have faded fast... but Epson Ultrachrome inks, or HP, or Canon pigments are pretty stable. There are aqueous coated vinyls but not many choices... keep in mind vinyl is NOT a long term substrate. 7-9 years is the longest lasting cast vinyl and inevitably, it will start to deteriorate.
Yes, if you are printing logos rather than jpeg / photo type images, and printing in high quality with overprints you can get results the same as screen printing with solvent inks. I'm not saying water based inks can't produce some good prints, but I have never seen any that are comparable for anywhere near the printer costReally?
I can't get the density (display light boxes), and materials cost way more, but colour gamut and detail, I'll take the pepsi challenge. And printer cost is way lower. I don't think there is any cast vinyl available for aqueous pigment, but with a good laminate, I've had prints in direct (London) sun for 5+ years with no visible image deteriation.Yes, if you are printing logos rather than jpeg / photo type images, and printing in high quality with overprints you can get results the same as screen printing with solvent inks. I'm not saying water based inks can't produce some good prints, but I have never seen any that are comparable for anywhere near the printer cost
That's the risk. Prints 'may' last ok with aqueous ink and laminated, or they many not, and do you really want to be replacing them after 6 months and losing your reputation ? Solvent inks are tried and tested for outdoor use, and we all know they are suitable for this. They also don't need laminating for a lot of applications.I can't get the density (display light boxes), and materials cost way more, but colour gamut and detail, I'll take the pepsi challenge. And printer cost is way lower. I don't think there is any cast vinyl available for aqueous pigment, but with a good laminate, I've had prints in direct (London) sun for 5+ years with no visible image deteriation.
That said, aqueous is the wrong technolgy for this purpose.
Why?Forgot to mention that we need this printer just for designing our samples.