SightLine
║▌║█║▌│║▌║▌█
2CT is mostly right..... I've tried to argue this same point before 2CT. Quite often anymore the Xeon equivalent is the better option. On this particular comparison the Xeon definitely wins unless you really need the integrated graphics which is the primary difference and the Xeons base frequency is 100mhz faster and it uses slightly less power (and it's cheaper) - so they are not "exactly" the same.
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/417/Intel_Core_i7_i7-4770_vs_Intel_Xeon_E3-1241_v3.html
I've also always been a proponent of ECC memory. Sure it will cost you a few cents more but the peace of mind that it will literally prevent 99.9% of memory errors is worth it. For us, uptime and production matter a lot. A blue screen in the middle of some big project is not my idea of uptime.
Intel comparison of the E3 xeons to the i series. http://promotions.newegg.com/b2b/microsoft/11-4345/images/imgs/why_choose_intel_xeon.pdf
http://www.intel.com/content/dam/ww.../xeon-e3-1200v2-workstation-desktop-guide.pdf
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/417/Intel_Core_i7_i7-4770_vs_Intel_Xeon_E3-1241_v3.html
I've also always been a proponent of ECC memory. Sure it will cost you a few cents more but the peace of mind that it will literally prevent 99.9% of memory errors is worth it. For us, uptime and production matter a lot. A blue screen in the middle of some big project is not my idea of uptime.
Intel comparison of the E3 xeons to the i series. http://promotions.newegg.com/b2b/microsoft/11-4345/images/imgs/why_choose_intel_xeon.pdf
http://www.intel.com/content/dam/ww.../xeon-e3-1200v2-workstation-desktop-guide.pdf